e
The bar chart compares expenditure spending in three distinct kinds of fast food that were consumed by three income group in the UK in 1990
In general, it is clear that the people who belong to high income group tended to use more fast food than other group. Pizza was the kind of fast food least choice for under high-income group while that was Fish and Chips in high-income group.
People in high income group spend the most money into fast food in 1990. They consumed about 45 USD per week for Hamburger and 17 USD and 19 USD per week for Fish & Chips and Pizza respectively. In average income, the people also tended to spend most money for Hamburger with 33 USD per week. Besides, the expenditure for Fish & Chip came to closesecond at 25 USD per week. The lowest expenditure in a weak was only 12 USD on Pizza.
There was a slightly distinction in choice of people who belong to low income group. Fish & Chips was they spending most budget with above 15 USD per week. The figure of Hamburger lower minorly with approximately 14 USD per week. And the lowest figure belong to Pizza when the low income people spent only 7 USD in order to consume it.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-12-25 | Lethanh54 | 67 | view |
| 2024-12-24 | Trần Ánh Vy | 67 | view |
| 2024-12-23 | yamatos | view | |
| 2024-12-22 | barek133743621 | view | |
| 2024-12-22 | barek133743621 | view |
- the graph shows the consumtion of fish and some diferent kinds of meat in a Eropean country between 1979 and 2004 11
- the graph shows relative price changes for fresh fruits and vegetables suger and sweets and cabonated drinks between 1978 and 2009 in US 78
- the line graph shows the percentage of tourists to England who visited to four diferent attractions in Brighton 56
- e 11
- the line graphs show the differentce on income in five country between 1978 and 2008 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 11, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('slightly') instead an adjective, or a noun ('distinction') instead of another adjective.
...ak was only 12 USD on Pizza. There was a slightly distinction in choice of people who belong to low i...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, second, so, while, in general, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 948.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 212.0 196.424390244 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.47169811321 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81578560438 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.27800639644 2.65546596893 86% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.47641509434 0.547539520022 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 282.6 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 53.0839036474 43.030603864 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.1818181818 112.824112599 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2727272727 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.81818181818 5.23603664747 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.215688989381 0% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.103423049105 0% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0843802449381 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.15604864568 0% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0819641961636 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.3 13.2329268293 70% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 77.57 61.2550243902 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.65 11.4140731707 76% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.44 8.06136585366 80% => OK
difficult_words: 25.0 40.7170731707 61% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.