WRITING
Write about the following topic :
A person's worth nowadays seems to be judged according to social status and material possessions .Old-fashioned values ,such as honour ,kindness and trust ,no longer seem important .
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion ?
Give reasons for your answer and include any examples from your own knowledge or experience . Write at least 250 words .
Social status and material possessions are said to judge a person’s worth nowadays, instead of outdated values, such as Honour, Kindness, and Trust. I consider those old-fashioned ideas are not let down and still plays a considerable role in assessing a person. New ideologies must be subjected to revisions, and reforms, in order to have sustainable growth and development.
To begin with, Change is said to be inevitable, similarly, people started to consider other's credibility in terms of silly possessions and unstable status, all those factors are short-term. Materialistic society can never pave the way to success and the well-being of its people. Money, gold, house, and precious ornaments are inclusive in terms of materialistic wealth. In the same way, Social status can also be earned. But, None of this is said to be permanent and commonly subjected to change.
On the other hand, Kindness is well appreciated and rejoiced even today and it should be the basic character of any human being irrespective of his position in society. Honesty and Trust is equally important for a person to be respected in his family and office. The above-mentioned qualities are the moral character traits to be followed by a person to gain a good reputation and validity as a “Gentle Man/ Woman”.
To Conclude, It's better to have Good Housing and a comfortable lifestyle, but that alone is never enough to say the worth of an Individual. Reforms should be done to change people's mindset and reinforce the importance of ancient values of Trust, Kindness, and honour, which helps us to build a good healthy society.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-12-04 | tsln7607 | 56 | view |
| 2023-09-15 | Nowshin Tabassum | 61 | view |
| 2023-05-03 | The Lazy Tiger | 84 | view |
| 2023-05-03 | The Lazy Tiger | 78 | view |
| 2023-04-14 | tuyetsa2004@gmail.com | 73 | view |
- The diagram below represents the Comparison of how urban Chinese spent across major categories in 1995 versus the spending habits in 2011 Summarise the information given in the diagrams Write at least 150 words 70
- some people believe that it s good to share as much information as possible in scientific research business and the academic world others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely discuss both views and give your o 84
- Some people believe that young people know about international pop and movie stars but know very little about famous people from the history in their own country Why is this How con more interest is created in young people to gain more knowledge about the 67
- The graph shows Underground Station passenger numbers in London Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant You should write at least 150 words 80
- in the future all cars buses and trucks will be driverless the only people travelling inside will be the passengers do you think the advantages of driverless vehicles outweigh the disadvantages 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, similarly, so, still, well, such as, to begin with, in the same way, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1359.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 266.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.10902255639 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03850299372 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97492916156 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.609022556391 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 424.8 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 5.0 0.809619238477 618% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.3046124049 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.538461538 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4615384615 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.76923076923 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.214944244781 0.244688304435 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0721771516737 0.084324248473 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.065934936746 0.0667982634062 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125716658569 0.151304729494 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0545506620509 0.056905535591 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.26 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.