As global trade increases between different countries, many daily necessities are produced in other countries. Such goods are usually transported a long distance. Do the benefits of this trend outweigh its drawbacks?
Globalisation has enormously evolved in the 21st century that can be seen anywhere in the universe. Goods are produced in many countries and are then delivered to other countries, which poses a transportation problem for the nations. However, the advantages of transporting goods outweigh its disadvantages because transportation of necessities cannot be avoided and it helps countries and their people economically as well.
Transporting daily life necessities is crucial for individuals’ lives and it also creates jobs for many people. Food is vital for every person, thus it should be easily available for them to consume. Transportation helps in delivering foods or ingredients to nations the world over to make it accessible for every individual. The requirement of transportation also creates jobs for many, such as pilots. Therefore, transportation helps to export and import the daily necessities, and also boosts the economy of a country. For instance, China exports goods worth $5 billion every year and the GDP of the country increases 2 per cent anually.
Supplying commodities to the countries that are far away consumes a lot of fuel which causes pollution and takes a lot of time too. Food is significant for everyone and its availability at every place is significant that results in delivering such goods in every corner of the wold. Therefore, transportation consumes a lot of fuel, which involves exorbitant amount of money, and transportation mediums, such as ships and planes produce greenhouse gases which increase the trouble of global warming. To illustrate, Asian companies spend double of production cost on transportation because they deliver goods to farthest countries.
In conclusion, although transportation to farther places incur a lot of money and causes pollution, the need to deliver necessities to countries and their people should not be ignored, as essentials are crucial for the daily life of people.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-10-22 | Chirag Bhardwaj | 73 | view |
| 2020-08-20 | nainsi1991@gmail.com | 47 | view |
| 2019-10-19 | Navkiran kaur | 85 | view |
| 2018-11-14 | bhatvishal@ | 62 | view |
- Today more and more tourists are visiting places where conditions are difficult such as the Sahara desert or the Antarctic What are the benefits and disadvantages for tourists who visit such places 67
- Today the advanced science and technology have made great changes to people s life but artists such as musicians painters and writers are still highly valued What can arts tell us about life that science and technology cannot 78
- The main purpose of public libraries is to provide books and they shouldn t waste their limited resources and spaces on providing expensive hi tech media such as computer software videos and DVDs To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 73
- You have been facing a lot of issues at work lately Write a letter to your Reporting Manager informing him about this In your letter Explain what who is affecting your work and people s attitude towards you What your expectations are from this work office 96
- It is more important for schoolchildren to learn about local history than world history To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 562, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... For instance, China exports goods worth billion every year and the GDP of the co...
^^
Line 5, column 609, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'to the farthest'.
Suggestion: to the farthest
...ansportation because they deliver goods to farthest countries. In conclusion, although t...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, then, therefore, thus, well, for instance, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1647.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 302.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.45364238411 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1687104957 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.23948200698 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.53642384106 0.561755894193 95% => OK
syllable_count: 506.7 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 5.43587174349 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.5376050028 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.642857143 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5714285714 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.28571428571 7.06120827912 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.237618771988 0.244688304435 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0874722978598 0.084324248473 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0651638688147 0.0667982634062 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157013474418 0.151304729494 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0559098739038 0.056905535591 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.33 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.17 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.