The bar chart below shows the hours per week that teenagers spend doing certain activities in Chester from 2002 to 2007.
The supplied bar chart compares the amount of time spent by juveniles in seven different activities during the period 2002 to 2007 in Chester. Units are measured in hours per week.
A glance at the graph reveals that in all six years, children spent maximum hours watching television while minimum time was given to bowling. In addition, watching television was more than twice most liked activity than the rest for the given time period.
Now turning to details, teenagers watched television for 25 hours a week in both 2002 and 2003 then increasing to more than 35 hours in 2007. Till 2006, watching DVDs was more popular than going to pubs/discos as about 18 hours in a week were dedicated to DVDs, thus making it second in the list in 2004 which was replaced by pubs and discos in 2007.
Interestingly, the number of hours/week for which youngsters did homework and sports declined from 2002(about 12 and 10 hours respectively) to 2007(approximately 7 and 2 hours respectively), whereas for shopping it was vice-versa. Bowling being the least liked activity was given merely less than 5 hours in 2002 and only about 1 hour in 2007.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-03-10 | Desi Sari Ayuni | 67 | view |
| 2021-10-03 | datnguyentienhnvn@gmail.com | 78 | view |
| 2021-08-11 | Komaldeep | 61 | view |
| 2021-07-23 | kimtaeyeons | 73 | view |
| 2021-07-23 | kimtaeyeons | 11 | view |
- It is often said that the government spends too much money on projects to protect wildlife while there are other problems that are more important Do you agree or disagree 84
- The table below shows information about consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002 67
- The diagrams below show the water supply system in Australia at present and in future Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features 87
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010 73
- A year ago you lent your favourite book to a friend who you thought would enjoy it Unfortunately your friend has forgotten to return it The book has sentimental value to you as it had been presented by your grandmother Write a letter to your friend In the 86
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, second, then, thus, whereas, while, as for, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 946.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 195.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.85128205128 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73687570622 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71215638228 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 106.607317073 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.615384615385 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 262.8 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.9441477775 43.030603864 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.25 112.824112599 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.375 22.9334400587 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.375 5.23603664747 141% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.26534321873 0.215688989381 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.13360351563 0.103423049105 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0771139990203 0.0843802449381 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.179793175998 0.15604864568 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.103922221638 0.0819641961636 127% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.2329268293 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 72.5 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.15 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.15 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.