Museums and art galleries should concentrate on local works rather than showing the cultures or artworks from other countries.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Cultural museums and galleries play a major role in a country's economy. It is opined by some people that local culture and art should be given more importance in these places instead of displaying foreign artworks. From my perspective, museums and galleries should focus more on domestic art thus assisting local people economically and socially.
It is undeniable that by displaying local artworks a vast array of jobs can be provided to local artists which would curb unemployment. This is because, art galleries and museums could attract more tourists by representing a nation's culture. To exemplify, according to a survey of The Times, a large proportion of foreign people prefer visiting countries with rich heritage. Therefore, not only tourist industry would proliferate but also artists would benefit.
Furthermore, young generations could also learn about their culture through local museums and galleries. If a nation's culture would be given more recognition at such places, the interest of children and teenagers to know their own heritage would grow. For example, cultural tours organized by educational institutes would provide them and insight to their cultural history. In addition, students who are interested in art could get encouraged by local works and acquire their skills.
To recapitulate, concentrating more on domestic artwork would significantly provide more advantages to a country's economy by creating a job market. Moreover, young people learning their nation's past and talents of artists of their country would enrich cultural heritage. In future, these people can contribute hugely in keeping cultural art alive.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-10-21 | jessie_12345 | 61 | view |
- The bar chart shows the percentage of international students enrolled in British universities in two years 1990 and 2014 75
- The diagrams below show the water supply system in Australia at present and in future Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features 87
- A year ago you lent your favourite book to a friend who you thought would enjoy it Unfortunately your friend has forgotten to return it The book has sentimental value to you as it had been presented by your grandmother Write a letter to your friend In the 86
- The chart below shows how much money is spent in the budget on different sectors by the UAE government in 2000 84
- The diagram below shows how coal is used to produce electricity 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 272, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'In the future'?
Suggestion: In the future
...country would enrich cultural heritage. In future, these people can contribute hugely in ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, moreover, so, therefore, thus, for example, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1401.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 252.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.55952380952 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98428260373 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87639840781 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 176.041082164 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.579365079365 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 435.6 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 24.3168917522 49.4020404114 49% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 100.071428571 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.92857142857 7.06120827912 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.22719103851 0.244688304435 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0882654303904 0.084324248473 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0541496841289 0.0667982634062 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150690903448 0.151304729494 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0622795750209 0.056905535591 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.67 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.73 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.