It is argued among some entities that formal clothing is a very important employees’ skill, whereas there are some companies who opine that what is crucial is the work performance. In my opinion, quality of work has to be acquired by employers, because it is the only adjective standard.
On the one hand, many believe that a specific dress code should be highly recommended as employees’ duty. Uniforms do not only determine someone’s personality, but also people’s first judging is based on how we are looking. As a result, superiors would be able to analyze if a worker is as professional as it is required only by the impression of appearance. For example, a recent study found out that multinational companies assess their employees according to whether their appearance is appropriate or not, beyond quality of work. However, clothes would not give significant effect on someone’s quality of work.
On the other hand, there are some organizations who state that job capacity should be prioritized instead of clothing. Employees’ ability does not depend on their clothes, which only aim to impress others. Capability in responsibility and other traits cannot be evaluated through the appearance but only through the personal characteristics. To illustrate this, based on recent studies, some researchers argue that natural talent and hard work will triumph, whether a person is extravagantly dressed or not, affirming that self-care cannot improve job performance.
To sum up, even if firms believe that physical appearance and appropriate dressing outweigh the quality of someone’s work, I strongly believe that the prestige in others’ eyes is only improved by work performance, as the latter is a non-discriminatory characteristic.
- The table below shows the hours of leisure time spent by people in different age groups in Someland Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- The diagram shows how geothermal energy is used to produce electricity 73
- The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household the second chart shows the greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy use 61
- The pie chart below shows tge results of a survey of the causes foor poor learning outcomes in schools in a particularly country in 2011 73
- Some people believe that capital punishment should never be used Others however argue that it should be allowed for the most serious crimes Discuss both the views and give your opinion 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, look, so, whereas, as to, for example, as a result, in my opinion, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1492.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 274.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.44525547445 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.25634173908 2.80592935109 116% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.587591240876 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 464.4 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.5618914628 49.4020404114 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.333333333 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8333333333 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.5 7.06120827912 149% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.192094323067 0.244688304435 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0699995649903 0.084324248473 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0424538102312 0.0667982634062 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118816402186 0.151304729494 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0172359661505 0.056905535591 30% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.0946893788 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.63 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.34 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.