Throughout history, there has been considerable discussion about the exploitation of those working at the bottom of a company. Some people suggest that all workers, regardless of their positions, should be treated equally and given the same number of holidays, while others do not agree. From my perspective, people in a company should be treated differently.
Admittedly, the employee-friendly policy helps reduce financial loss, and the General Motors is a good example. The CEO of General Motors cannot endure to lose more than 20 billion dollars a year, so he and the company’s executives come up with a resolution strategy, which let all employees have the same number of holidays. Afterward, the company shows a turn from loss to profits because the employees are getting more motivation and working harder than before. However, this does not necessarily mean that all workers could have the same number of vacations in a year.
In fact, the people in company should not be equally treated and have the same number of vacations in a year. First and foremost, a company consists of many requisite divisions, such as sales department, marketing department, purchasing department. The company cannot operate without any of these departments. If all people have the same days of annual leave, there will be no people going to keep the company running. Afterward, the company will have high probability of paralysis, followed by bankruptcy, which will cause a heavy loss of economy.
Second, the different treatment for annual leave reflects the value of promotion and the commitment workers make. People will get incentives, if they become a leader of one division with more benefits above those of others. According to the data of University of Pennsylvania’s Wharton School, treating employees differently makes a significant difference to the increasing rate of capitalization. For example, the increasing rate of the company treating staff differently is twenty percent faster than that of the company treating staff with the same number of vacations. This is mainly due to the fact that it can stimulate people to compete, and this competition helps maximize the profits of the company.
In conclusion, the idea of offering employees equal days of vacations is completely unacceptable. This practice leads to the breakdown of a company and encourages workers to show their potentials to their fullest. Hence, all companies should not follow this trend.
- now a days more people are choosing to socialize online rather than face to face it is a positive or a negative development 95
- The graph shows the availability of various sweeteners in the USA from 1966 to 2012. 67
- All the people in a company should be treated equally and provided with the same numbers of vacations in a year To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- Do you agree or disagree with the statement These days children spend more time on doing homework or participating in organized activities related to school or sports However they would be given more time to do whatever they want 90
- Some people believe that newspaper is the best way to learn about news While others believe that more effective way is through other media Discuss both views and give your own opinion 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, hence, however, if, second, so, while, for example, in conclusion, in fact, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.48453608247 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 4.92783505155 244% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 9.0 5.05154639175 178% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.03092783505 198% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 32.9175257732 58% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 26.3917525773 208% => Less preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 12.0 3.85567010309 311% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2076.0 937.175257732 222% => Less number of characters wanted.
No of words: 392.0 206.0 190% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.29591836735 4.54256449028 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44960558625 3.78020617076 118% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97362766237 2.54303337028 117% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 127.690721649 161% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.525510204082 0.622605031667 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 648.0 290.88556701 223% => syllable counts are too long.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.41237113402 120% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.13402061856 33% => OK
Article: 10.0 0.824742268041 1212% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 1.83505154639 163% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.463917525773 431% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 1.44329896907 346% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 12.6804123711 158% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 16.3608247423 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.4811642236 44.8134815571 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.8 76.5299724578 136% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6 16.8248392259 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5 4.34317383033 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.29896907216 116% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 2.54639175258 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 7.41237113402 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.49484536082 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.94845360825 127% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.36825910277 0.216113520407 170% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.116182322176 0.0766984524023 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.126872786162 0.0603063233224 210% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.205392052844 0.12726935374 161% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0728103827789 0.0580467560999 125% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 8.37731958763 159% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 70.7449484536 62% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 3.82989690722 230% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 7.45979381443 160% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.46 8.71597938144 154% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.65 7.59969072165 114% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 41.2886597938 245% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 8.62886597938 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 8.54432989691 112% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 8.15463917526 147% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.