Nowadays as women and men have to work full time household duties should be equally divided Do you agree or disagree

In recent years, there has been considerable discussion about how to promote the concept of gender equality. This has led to a suggestion that regardless of gender, housework needs to be shared equally. Personally speaking, I would agree with this statement to a large extent for the following two reasons.
To begin with, housework should be equally shared because women’s social role has changed over the past few decades. For example, women just stayed home to be housewives and did all housework in the past, but nowadays they need to seek full-time jobs to supplement household incomes. If women work in the daytime and also do housework after work, then the stress and fatigue will compromise their mental and physical health. Therefore, housework should not be done only by women.
Second, housework should be done by both genders because it can help to build a harmonious family which emphasizes gender equality. For instance, if parents share their daily responsibilities, they are able to convey a message to their children that women are not synonymous with housework. It also helps them reduce the stress on their family.
In conclusion, housework should not be done exclusively by women; instead, it needs to be shared equally between men and women. I strongly believe that splitting household chores equally not only reduces the burden of female partners but also helps foster gender equality. Therefore, couples can equally assume all the duties and responsibilities of the family at the same time.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, second, so, then, therefore, for example, for instance, in conclusion, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1273.0 1615.20841683 79% => OK
No of words: 246.0 315.596192385 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.17479674797 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96035189615 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75226068154 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 176.041082164 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.59756097561 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 397.8 506.74238477 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.5869444909 49.4020404114 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.9230769231 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9230769231 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.61538461538 7.06120827912 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.269702110877 0.244688304435 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0937342522303 0.084324248473 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0746916422957 0.0667982634062 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15840179006 0.151304729494 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.111063324753 0.056905535591 195% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.0946893788 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.64 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 78.4519038076 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.