In 1995 a microscopic fungus called Phytophthora ramorum, or P. ramorum, was first detected in the forests of the western United States. P. ramorum infects trees and causes particularly serious damage in oak trees: in many infected oaks, leaves wither rapidly, large cracks appear in the bark, and the trees die. A spread of P. ramorum represents a serious threat to the forests in the western states. Several methods of protecting the forests have been proposed.
The reading states that the microscopic fungus known as Phytophthora Ramoroum infected the forests of the western United States and presents several procedures of protection and conservation of these forests and provides three reasons for support. However, the professor explains that, unfortunately, these methods have severe faults and not only seem to be impractical but not have a significant impact on such forests.
First, the reading state that is preventing from spreading these fungus spores by means of impeding human-assisted spread spores by way of shoes and bicycle tires and appreciated to wash their shoes. The professor opposes this point by stating that on a rainy day, water from the rain washes all path and rout from spores; these spores could have spread by rain wash, these human effect is trivial.
Second, the article states that fungicidal use might have been a useful and advantage to protect the tree from disease. However, the professor contends that the spread of this fungicidal directly on trunk might have worked in small-scale such as a park; nonetheless, the prodigious size of forest and expansiveness of these areas maybe not a good idea; in addition, it has a costly expenditure.
Third, the reading avers that the approaches accomplish with cutting and burning the disease trees, but it also contains cutting and burning the virtually healthy oaks. The professor opposes this point by declaring that some trees such as oaks play a vital role in the earth's environment and are rare restoration and coming back of these species are an arduous effort; Hence It is costly and great ecological damage to forests.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-25 | MA KUNG TING | 80 | view |
| 2023-08-10 | nusybah | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-12 | Zmx_6 | 83 | view |
| 2023-07-12 | Zmx_6 | 70 | view |
| 2023-01-17 | nikki07hung | 68 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 76
- The best way to solve environmental problems caused by consumer-generated waste is for towns and cities to impose strict limits on the amount of trash they will accept from each household.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree 50
- Burning coal in power plants produces a waste product called coal ash a material that contains small amounts of potentially harmful chemicals Environmentalists in the United States are concerned about the damage such harmful chemicals may be doing to the 85
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is important to know about events happening around the world even if it is unlikely that they will affect your daily life Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 90
- Some people believe that our ever-increasing use of technology significantly reduces our opportunities for human interaction. Other people believe that technology provides us with new and better ways to communicate and connect with one another.Write a res 83
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 270, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'earths'' or 'earth's'?
Suggestion: earths'; earth's
...s such as oaks play a vital role in the earths environment and are rare restoration an...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, however, if, may, nonetheless, second, so, third, in addition, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 7.30242825607 219% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 22.412803532 98% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 30.3222958057 92% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1388.0 1373.03311258 101% => OK
No of words: 267.0 270.72406181 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19850187266 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04229324003 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7112638676 2.5805825403 105% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 145.348785872 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.580524344569 0.540411800872 107% => OK
syllable_count: 419.4 419.366225166 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 13.0662251656 61% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 33.0 21.2450331126 155% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 49.0788587377 49.2860985944 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 173.5 110.228320801 157% => OK
Words per sentence: 33.375 21.698381199 154% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.875 7.06452816374 168% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.27373068433 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.116762291379 0.272083759551 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0521502624588 0.0996497079465 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0624264546899 0.0662205650399 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0690956512936 0.162205337803 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0393790175269 0.0443174109184 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.8 13.3589403974 148% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.98 53.8541721854 71% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 5.55761589404 202% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 11.0289183223 147% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.47 12.2367328918 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.47 8.42419426049 112% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 63.6247240618 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 10.7273730684 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.2 10.498013245 145% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.2008830022 134% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.