The line graph illustrates the changes in the percentages of over-65-year-old people in three different countries, namely Japan, Sweden, and the US, over a period of 100 years from 1840 to 1940.
Overall, the percentage of over-65-year-old people obtained an upward trend in all countries during the given time.
In the year 1840, the figure for people in both two countries Sweden and the United state was more than Japan, by about 4% and roughly 2% respectively. During a century, the proportion of over-65-year-old people in Sweden and the US had a small fluctuation, but the trend was upward and more than the figure for Japan during the first nine decades; and, both of them stopped at roughly 25%
Looking at the figure for Japan, it started at 5% in 1840, the percentage of Japan decreased slightly to nearly 3% in 1860, stabled at 3% from 1860 to 1880 and then rocketed, overcoming the USA and Sweden in 1930s. Japan had the highest point at above 27% at the end of the period.
- The pie charts below show the comparison of different kinds of energy production of France in two years
- Many high street shops have gone out of business in recent years Why do you think this has happened Is it a positive or negative development 84
- Recent research shows that the consumption of junk food is a major factor in poor diet and this is detrimental to health Some people believe that better health education is the answer to this problem but others disagree What is your opinion 73
- The two pie charts below show the percentages of industry sectors contribution to the economy of Turkey in 2000 and 2016 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The table shows the Proportions of Pupils Attending Four Secondary School Types between 2000 and 2009 72
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 390, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...and, both of them stopped at roughly 25% Looking at the figure for Japan, it star...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 206, Rule ID: IN_1990s[1]
Message: The article is probably missing here: 'in the 1930s'.
Suggestion: in the 1930s
...rocketed, overcoming the USA and Sweden in 1930s. Japan had the highest point at above 2...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, look, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 824.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 173.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.76300578035 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62669911048 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8320160213 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.549132947977 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 233.1 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 34.0 22.4926829268 151% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 136.447205908 43.030603864 317% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 164.8 112.824112599 146% => OK
Words per sentence: 34.6 22.9334400587 151% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.2 5.23603664747 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0996294182132 0.215688989381 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0625690086019 0.103423049105 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0646176490884 0.0843802449381 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0761459853423 0.15604864568 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0654844805574 0.0819641961636 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.3 13.2329268293 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.35 61.2550243902 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.92 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.24 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.6 10.9970731707 142% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.