Online Shopping is increasing significantly.
What are the effects on the environment and the type of jobs that require?
Mostly people enjoy to purchase goods by e- commerce, leading to them increasing carbon foot print. Thus, people can utilize this situation by being a trade developer app.
People are more likely to buy goods by online trade, resulting in them rising carbon food print. That is because goods delivered into costumer's home spent more kilograms of CO2 when those are sent with speedy delivery, contributing ecological issues. Therefore, more and more carbon spent leads to acute diseases, relating on respiration. For example, study in the Germany show that pizza supplier drive by motor cycle to distribute in the costumer's home with 10 hours a day, producing 20 kilograms of CO2 in total, with hovered 20 km to reach, leading to risk of respiration.
By taking opportunity, people can work by online such as trade developer app, being beneficial for online shopper. That is to say needed by buyer is the tech, accessing online items, and those need the app to provide them purchasing it, leading to be popular job needed. For example, Charis Feng was established Shoopee company as a big trade e-commerce, showing various products sold based on costumers need, and he created the app accessed by online in the world wide with features selling. Although online shoping has reputable way to buy items, there is online crime, threatening people going online.
To conclude, contributing carbon emission is caused by people who tend to buy goods. This condition will give opportunity for people being app developer. Where possible, the effect for those can be solved by the authority.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-11-11 | Hestivivin | 67 | view |
- These graphs show the result of a survey 100 people single men and women and couples with without children were interviewed to find out who they typically spend time with on a free day The percentages shown averages 73
- Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships people make Has this become a positive or negative development 78
- Causes of mortality in young people 78
- the percentage of population by race 84
- Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships people make Has this become a positive or negative development 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 460, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled as one.
Suggestion: worldwide
...eated the app accessed by online in the world wide with features selling. Although online ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 460, Rule ID: WORLD_WIDE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'worldwide'?
Suggestion: worldwide
...eated the app accessed by online in the world wide with features selling. Although online ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 186, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this can' or 'those cans'?
Suggestion: this can; those cans
...veloper. Where possible, the effect for those can be solved by the authority.
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, so, therefore, thus, for example, such as, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1329.0 1615.20841683 82% => OK
No of words: 260.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11153846154 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61201989445 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 176.041082164 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.596153846154 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 418.5 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.7306453388 49.4020404114 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.230769231 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.76923076923 7.06120827912 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0842122202762 0.244688304435 34% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0333490706031 0.084324248473 40% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0343403560981 0.0667982634062 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0474210734013 0.151304729494 31% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0379567657332 0.056905535591 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.88 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.