Studies suggest that many teenagers these days prefer socialising online to meeting one another in person.
Why do you think this is the case?
What measures could be taken to encourage teenagers to spend more time meeting one another in person?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
It is true that the young generation these days is most likely to use social networks or other online platforms for meeting others instead of face-to-face, which makes so many conveniences. Some people believe that it will bring negative effects to young people including me. On the other hand, to encourage those for restricting this bad habit, if it has the school education and family care.
School education plays an important role in organizing students' mindsets and communicating ways with others. For encouraging teenagers, school education needs to pay more attention to the activity point in school instead of completing the academic point. In addition, they should generate more and more school activities. For example, the English contest, invention competition, culture exchange,... In this way, that not only helps students improve their social connection with others in person but also can enhance their physical and mental statements comprehensively. Moreover, teachers ought to take care of their children if they are abusing technology platforms and teach them how important face-to-face communication is.
To be similar, the family should be a good pattern because of the strong impression of their children. They should create opportunities for their children's outside activities. For instance, generating family outdoor activities such as picnics, going fishing, that will make the family be closed and avoid their teenagers abusing technology so much. The parents have to often talk to their children after school or dinner for creating a good habit to share with others in person.
Teenagers could not resist the attraction of technology, especially with purposes for meeting with others. It has a negative for children's development. To solve this issue that needs support from school education and family.
- Explain some of the ways in which humans are damaging the environment What can governments do to address these problems What can individual people do 61
- The chart shows the percentage of women and men in one Asian country who passed when they took their driving test between 1980 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 86
- Around the world many adults are working from home and more children are beginning to study from home because technology has become cheaper and more accessible Do you think this is a positive or negative development 73
- Some people say that the Internet is making the world smaller by bringing people together To what extent do you agree that the internet is making it easier for people to communicate with one another 73
- Studies suggest that many teenagers these days prefer socializing online to meeting one another in person Why do you think this is the case What measures could be taken to encourage teenagers to spend more time meeting one another in person Give reasons f 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 395, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , .
... invention competition, culture exchange,... In this way, that not only helps stud...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, moreover, so, for example, for instance, in addition, such as, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1552.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 282.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.50354609929 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86599421509 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.599290780142 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 470.7 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.0251041046 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.0 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.625 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.6875 7.06120827912 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.103914535728 0.244688304435 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.03411853412 0.084324248473 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0333590249843 0.0667982634062 50% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0705812509788 0.151304729494 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0178230146297 0.056905535591 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.32 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.68 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.