The first car appeared on British roads in 1888. By the year 2000 there may be as many as 29 million vehicles on British roads. Alternative forms of transport should be encouraged and international laws introduced to control car ownership and use. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your knowledge or experience.
Significant number of rising car ownership from 1888 to 2000 in Britain initiates the government to restrict more vehicles especially car for society in many ways. I advocate to the government side to search the right way of diminishing people in using personal car. I will cover the explanation below.
Nowadays, the people prefer to fulfill their comfy to have travel or go anywhere despite longer or shorter destination. Driving personal car with their family, spouse, or acquaintance is the best choice to use due to enormous factors they have determined such as pride, safety, and free. Moreover, a number of people state detrimental things using general transportation which has been provided by the government, regarding their opinion getting on buses or train demand them to tolerate more with the other people. If we see reverse and wiser version, car or personal vehicles will have vivid disadvantages for huger global, particularly for environmental issues. Refusing personal attention, people will afford traffic situation, air pollution, and high demand of stress.
The more consumers who get interest in having car, the more mobile industry gaining the products with variation and innovative speculation without determine how the effect of public situation. If we imagine that per house possesses one or two cars this will exacerbate a highway in every region, hence people will cover their daily activities going to school, work, and other habit. Althought the people understand the problem of mobiling personal car, they remain using it but keep complaining the effect. Many of employees feel exhausted after coming back from their work and should accept other unconvinience in way home situation because of traffic.
Deciding betters option and following government decision in limiting personal mobile transport will enhance more benefit both society and environment.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-01-07 | JOE Chen | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-05 | Selena17_ | 73 | view |
| 2021-09-21 | muhammad Hamza | 73 | view |
| 2021-08-10 | ivantran | 78 | view |
| 2021-01-11 | MinatureNomad | 66 | view |
- Outline why you have selected your chosen three university courses, and explain how this relates to your previous academic or professional experience and your plans for the future. Please do not duplicate the information you have entered on the work exper 70
- Some people think that keeping pets is good for children while others think it is dangerous and unhealthy. Which opinion do you agree with? Discuss both options and give examples. 67
- the prediction of total population in india and china in 2000 to 2050 78
- The graph below shows the number of university graduates in Canada from 1992 to 2007. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- over fishing has become a very common practice in many countries what do you think are the effects of ever fishing use your own knowledge and experience and support your arguments with examples and relevant evidence 87
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 714, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to traffic'
Suggestion: to traffic
... personal attention, people will afford traffic situation, air pollution, and high dema...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, if, moreover, regarding, so, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 13.1623246493 15% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1602.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 293.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.46757679181 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77708342289 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 176.041082164 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.655290102389 0.561755894193 117% => OK
syllable_count: 498.6 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.5615327428 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.230769231 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5384615385 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.69230769231 7.06120827912 52% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.123720049437 0.244688304435 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0466834432764 0.084324248473 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0471668386361 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.083376307361 0.151304729494 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0566450045341 0.056905535591 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.0946893788 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.74 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.85 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.