These days, people hold the belief that the Internet could help to close the gap between people all around the world effortlessly. I entirely agree with this statement and firmly believe that the Internet plays a pivotal role in communication.
From a social perspective, the Internet helps people in any part of the world can commute at any time. In the Internetization era, it is too easy for people to chat with others by using computers or smartphones. Moreover, the Internet brings a convenient way for people located anywhere. Thanks to the distribution of the Internet, from mainlands to faraway islands, people could set a meeting with their counterparts readily. Despite the geographic distance, the relatives or friends might chat to each other by a single click or just by a voice.
From an economic perspective, the Internet accompanies by benefits for the online-communication. Firstly, customers would pay less money for commuting on the Internet. The reason is that there is fierce competition among Internet providers; thus, there is a significant decrease in the Internet fee. Ten years ago, the cost of making an Internet phone call was roughly one dollar per minute, but now it is free, and the customers communicate with one another would more convenient than before. Secondly, people have more choices when using the Internet for online talking. Inspire of the fact that the online-network is a lucrative field, a plethora of big companies take part in this market. Also, if the users pay the same money to access the Internet, they tend to use the best. So people could talk to others with the high Internet qualities smoothly.
In conclusion, I strongly consider that the Internet is making the world smaller by bringing people together.
- The table shows the Proportions of Pupils Attending Four Secondary School Types between 2000 and 2009 72
- Some people say that the Internet is making the world smaller by bringing people together To what extent do you agree that the internet is making it easier for people to communicate with one another 78
- Many high street shops have gone out of business in recent years Why do you think this has happened Is it a positive or negative development 84
- The two pie charts below show the percentages of industry sectors contribution to the economy of Turkey in 2000 and 2016 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The pie charts below show the comparison of different kinds of energy production of France in two years 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, thus, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1474.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 290.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08275862069 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95534743778 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.579310344828 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 459.9 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.2549066269 49.4020404114 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.125 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.125 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.125 7.06120827912 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.446266679161 0.244688304435 182% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.151612442093 0.084324248473 180% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0960001530648 0.0667982634062 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.304841375295 0.151304729494 201% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0511334036808 0.056905535591 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.