Some cities create housing areas by providing taller buildings. Others create housing by building houses on a wider area of land. What solution is better?
Constructing and creating housing areas are one of the most quintessential as well as controversial issues facing many countries. Some cities highly prefer building taller buildings whilst the opponents consider creating housing areas on a broader area of land. This essay will look into both arguments by representing principal examples and giving clear and beneficial solution in the following paragraphs, before a reasoned conclusion.
On the one hand, it is an indisputable fact that every nation possesses its land. However, some countries have the biggest land. For instance, Russia has a colossal area rather than the other countries, and it has the least number of population in the world. It would be the wisest option that constructing modern buildings on a more expanded area in these kinds of cities. Mainly because the diminutive buildings will be strong, and the risk of falling down is lowest, especially, when the earth quick happens. Therefore, people can build more dwellings in Russia and the other countries which have wider places and less population.
On the other hand, it is irrefutable that there are some regions where have smaller areas and the sea like Singapour. It would be the appropriate choice that constructing outstanding buildings in these kinds of cities because of the risk of floods. However, there are other nations where live the highest percentage of the inhabitants, but they have a bigger area. For example, China, where the majority of the world population resides, and, nowadays, there are some regulations like the government allows every family to have to birth only 2 children because of its massive population. Furthermore, Chinese authorities endeavoring to construct higher buildings in order to save place.
In conclusion, it is evident that every nation is various, and they endeavor to perform any work according to their chances and conditions as well as financial status.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-12-17 | buiminhduc | 11 | view |
| 2021-12-17 | buiminhduc | 11 | view |
| 2021-07-17 | lilin_ | 84 | view |
| 2021-06-18 | rafsanfardin | 56 | view |
| 2021-05-23 | Awadhesh Mourya | 78 | view |
- Many museums and historical sites are mainly visited by tourists and not local people Why is this case What can be done to attract more local people 84
- The graph below presents the employment patterns in the USA between 1930 and 2010 78
- The most effective way to solve traffic and transport problems in the cities is to encourage people from the suburbs or the countryside to live in the cities To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- Some people think that outdoor activities are more beneficial for children s development than playing computer games To what extent do you agree or disagree 96
- The diagrams below illustrate the early tools from 1 4 million years ago and 800 000 years ago Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and making comparisons where relevant 100
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 258, Rule ID: ALSO_OTHER[1]
Message: Use simply 'there are other' or 'there are also'
Suggestion: there are other; there are also
...because of the risk of floods. However, there are also other nations where live the highest percenta...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, look, so, therefore, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1633.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 308.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.30194805195 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8527914769 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.571428571429 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 504.0 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.9332191779 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.866666667 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5333333333 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.73333333333 7.06120827912 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.346239858581 0.244688304435 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107434981412 0.084324248473 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.129218389923 0.0667982634062 193% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.186507034173 0.151304729494 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.15639189381 0.056905535591 275% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.46 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.24 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.