The flow chart illustrates the consequence of deforestation. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features.
The flow chart elucidates the principal results of deforestation.
Overall, the clear-cutting of forests is the dominant reason for deforestation.
To begin with, the first consequence of cutting the trees is heavy logging equipment compresses the soil. This result will cause three consecutive problems, which are soil becomes hard and baked, rainwater runs off, and flooding. The second consequence is fewer roots hold the topsoil erodes. This erosion affects pioneer species, and they move in, vegetation will degrade, after that, there will be less biodiversity.
Moreover, the third consequence of cutting trees is increasing the risk of burning (deliberate or accidental), this issue will cause waste wood from logging is destroyed, then, micro-organisms feeding on waste lost. Subsequently, inhabitants will move in and vegetation will degrade, which leads to less biodiversity. The fourth effect of deforestation is less moisture in the air, that issue results in less precipitation, and as a consequence of this trend, drought will accelerate, after that, residents will have to change their location, vegetation will degrade at the end.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-22 | hahoaan | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-21 | Trần Ánh Vy | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-20 | Giang Tran | 78 | view |
| 2024-11-19 | hahoaan | 78 | view |
| 2024-11-16 | Trần Ánh Vy | 67 | view |
- Some people think that outdoor activities are more beneficial for children s development than playing computer games To what extent do you agree or disagree 96
- The flow chart illustrates the consequence of deforestation Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features 78
- The diagram shows the procedure for university entry for high school graduates 95
- The line graph below shows oil production and consumption in China between 1982 and 2006 56
- The diagram gives information about the process of making carbonated drinks 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, moreover, second, so, then, third, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 1.00243902439 898% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 21.0 33.7804878049 62% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 3.97073170732 327% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 979.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 173.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.65895953757 4.92477711251 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62669911048 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13425947849 2.65546596893 118% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.624277456647 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 288.0 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 63.7938423438 43.030603864 148% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.777777778 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2222222222 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.11111111111 5.23603664747 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 1.13902439024 527% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0714425765054 0.215688989381 33% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0373324726543 0.103423049105 36% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0443684007333 0.0843802449381 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0572444186249 0.15604864568 37% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0525353563542 0.0819641961636 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.2329268293 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 61.2550243902 71% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.55 11.4140731707 136% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.87 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.