Many museums and historical sites are mainly visited by tourists and not local people.
Why is this case? What can be done to attract more local people?
At present, lots of museums and historical landmarks are mainly visited by foreign visitors and not indigenous people. This essay will look into the significant reasons for this activity and the most beneficial solutions to this issue in the following paragraphs with smooth examples, before a reasoned conclusion.
It is indisputable, nowadays, visiting the ancient destinations is extremely boring for the majority of local inhabitants. The principal cause of this problem is the development of cutting-edge technologies all over the world. For example, today, experienced and intelligent entrepreneurs, programmists are ascertaining updated programs, which can assist to indicate the whole appearance of some museums by creating their technical models in order to introduce audiences with prehistoric exponents. One of the most progressive solutions would be educating indigenous individuals by giving them quality knowledge. As a result of this trend, everybody can understand that utilizing new technologies will establish dangerous diseases like cancer among the people.
The second quintessential reason is traveling to the historical palaces or other castles is quite expensive. That is because a plethora of local residents do not want to expend their cash for this kind of journey. For instance, Buckingham Palace, which is located in England. Everyone should pay some money in order to enter there, and it is undeniable that we can only see tourists, who came from other countries in this historic landmark. The most viable solution to this would be canceling this system, which requires spending money. Furthermore, as a result of this consequence, the government can accelerate the number of residents, who go to museums or other ancient monuments.
In conclusion, evolution and expenditure are the most tremendous reasons for declining the number of local people in prehistoric places, as well as educating youngsters and banning the regulations, which demand paying money are the long-term solutions to this issue.
- The flow chart below shows an automatic photo booth Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 63
- The flow chart illustrates the consequence of deforestation Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features 78
- Scientists have been warning for many years that to protect the environment we have to limit the use of energy in our daily lives Despite warning many people do not pay attention to this What are the reasons for this and how can people be encouraged to sa 73
- In many countries women and men are working full time It is therefore logical for women and men to share household works To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
- The pie graphs show the nutritional consistency of two dinners Write a report to a university lecturer describing the data 91
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, look, second, so, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion, kind of, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1730.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 307.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.63517915309 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12263873804 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.596091205212 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 540.0 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.7700098848 49.4020404114 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.571428571 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9285714286 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.21428571429 7.06120827912 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.209680692825 0.244688304435 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0674523940293 0.084324248473 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.036915880514 0.0667982634062 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125488363818 0.151304729494 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0143523974125 0.056905535591 25% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.0946893788 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 50.2224549098 66% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.43 12.4159519038 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.18 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 78.4519038076 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.