Educators should take students' interests into account when planning the content of the courses they teach.
For planning the syllabus, students' interests can play an imporant role in deciding the subjects to be taught in a course.
Course subjects play a vital role in determining the popularity of any institution. To be favoured by a variety of students, courses must be well planned and must include student's suggestions. In today's fast growing world, young generation is becoming smarter and is understanding the importance of a good education. Students know their interests and are themselves going to learn the contents of the course. Hence it is logical to consider their suggestions regarding the course contents during syllabus development.
Secondly, there can be many course subjects which might have proved to be useful for the previous era, but are no longer a necessity for the current generation. As time flows, syllabus must be updated, and the best updation suggestions could come from students itself. For instance, the subject of hardware was quite useful for computer engineering students, however, due to the enhancement in domain knowledge of computers, hardware subject no longer has enough importance to match with newer, industry demanding subjects.
However, educators can't be fully dependent on students' suggestions. There can be many subjects which might feel unimportant to a student, but play a crutial role in the student's life. Young students would rule out difficult subjects as useless or boring, while promoting only specific domain-related subjects like Physical Education. For example, many students might find humanity courses as boring and repetitive, however these courses instill good manners and habits which help in the long run.
In conclusion, educators need to consider suggestions from the students while developing course content, but should not be focussed on implementing each and every suggestion. There are certain contents which need to remain in the courses regardless negative feedbacks from students.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-27 | KalyaniHarbola | 66 | view |
| 2022-09-12 | Bolu | 62 | view |
| 2022-03-16 | varunpandu006 | 50 | view |
| 2021-09-09 | Anirudha Balaji Shirsikar | 50 | view |
| 2021-01-02 | ali.rs | 50 | view |
- Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed 58
- Educators should take students interests into account when planning the content of the courses they teach 50
- The human mind will always be superior to machines because machines are only tools of human minds Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In de 54
- Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed 50
- In any field of endeavor it is impossible to make a significant contribution without first being strongly influenced by past achievements within that field 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 265, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...oung generation is becoming smarter and is understanding the importance of a good education. Stu...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 410, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...ng to learn the contents of the course. Hence it is logical to consider their suggest...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 20, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...demanding subjects. However, educators cant be fully dependent on students suggesti...
^^^^
Line 4, column 169, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
...student, but play a crutial role in the students life. Young students would rule out dif...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, however, if, regarding, second, secondly, still, well, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.3162921348 35% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 6.0 33.0505617978 18% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 58.6224719101 61% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1653.0 2235.4752809 74% => OK
No of words: 300.0 442.535393258 68% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.51 5.05705443957 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 4.55969084622 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90798708541 2.79657885939 104% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 215.323595506 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.556666666667 0.4932671777 113% => OK
syllable_count: 502.2 704.065955056 71% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 6.24550561798 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.4472221354 60.3974514979 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.2 118.986275619 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 23.4991977007 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.6 5.21951772744 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.201775401606 0.243740707755 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0808727559305 0.0831039109588 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0551294064055 0.0758088955206 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131437632753 0.150359130593 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.057860587235 0.0667264976115 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 14.1392134831 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 48.8420337079 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.68 12.1639044944 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.31 8.38706741573 111% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 100.480337079 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.