The chart below shows the value of one country's exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016. The table shows the change in each category of export in 2016 compared to 2015. Summarise the information and make a comparison where possible.
The bar chart below provides information about export earnings in million dollars of one country in different categories of Petroleum products, Engineering goods, Agriculture products, jams and jewelry, and Textile in 2015 and 2016. And in product category table gives the percentage difference in each kind of exportation during these years.
As an overall, trend petroleum products, agriculture goods, and Engineering products prices increased in 2016 while in table percentages of all goods value enhance expect gems and jewelry.
Firstly, in the graph, the value of petroleum export was highest in both years more than 60 million dollars in 2016 and slightly high in 2015 62 million dollars. In contrast, the lowest amount of business observed in the textile sector 25 million dollars in 2015 and 32 million dollars in 2016. While in Engineering products also do good business 61 million in 2016 and 55 million dollars in 2015 and in agriculture goods value remain the same in both years.
In the table below about percentage change in the value of each kind of products peaked increase change has seen in textile thing 15 percent rose, with comparison to agriculture products only 0.318 percent increment noticed. While decrease only observed in gems and jewelry products with 5 percent plunged during both years. And 3 and 8.5 percent rise shown by Agriculture and petroleum goods.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-11-20 | Farwa Nasir | 67 | view |
- The table below show the monthly family expenditure of an average Australian family in 1991 and 2001 Summarise the information and make comparison where possible 73
- Some people tend to play computer game rather than do sports Why is this What can be done tackle to problem 67
- Government investment in the arts such as music and theatre is a waste of money Governments must invest this money in public services instead To what extent do you agree with this statement 84
- A big salary is much more important than job satisfaction Do you agree or disagree Provide relevant examples if necessary both important if required earning or reword then 95
- Local people don t go very often to museum or historical sites What can be done to change this situation Give reasons and example from relevant experience 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 67, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a million'.
Suggestion: a million
...es information about export earnings in million dollars of one country in different cat...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 303, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...and 32 million dollars in 2016. While in Engineering products also do good busine...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, if, so, while, in contrast, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 6.8 206% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1167.0 965.302439024 121% => OK
No of words: 224.0 196.424390244 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20982142857 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86867284054 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64869875036 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.495535714286 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 338.4 283.868780488 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 0.482926829268 828% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.9255241931 43.030603864 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.666666667 112.824112599 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8888888889 22.9334400587 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.33333333333 5.23603664747 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.253366914453 0.215688989381 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111224360374 0.103423049105 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0793307512512 0.0843802449381 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.159788496312 0.15604864568 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.104685366588 0.0819641961636 128% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.2329268293 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 11.4140731707 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.0 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.4329268293 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.