Some people think advertising on TV is useful for viewers but other disagree. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
According to fewer individuals point of view watching adverts on electronic media is helpful for audience, while some other don't agree with this point. Both perspective have its own justifications, for first group its beneficial because it help in searching potential things. While other section think that this leads to unnecessary purchase and I also agree with second one.
Television is also important media to advertise products and its useful for watchers, because its provides general information about thing from where we can find. This is helpful in conserving time and energy to search desirable buying, the reason is that people educate generally from where we can find it. For example various online retailors sold particular things and their knowledge obtained from their adds on TV or electronic media, website OLX.com sells spare automobile parts on reasonable prices. And people can buy it without searching all online sites because they have seen on Tv about it.
Another argument is television adds are not of any use, the reason is that many thing that are not necessity of life or no need to purchase go into our desire list. Many things in our home which are working perfectly but want to replace just because newer or advance version of it marketed. Each year electronic companies launch their new products such as electric appliances and smart phone, and people buy it, dump off older one. This thing is also leading to environmental pollution by these unusable products because plastic mostly used which cannot be decompose, and if burned cause air contamination. However, if such adverts not publish on media people probably buy in lesser number.
In conclusion, Advertisement on screen have positive or negative impact on viewers is debatable by two groups of people who think opposite each other. Some thing it help us by saving time, while other consider as extravagant buying and indirectly effecting environment. In my point of view adds are not beneficial because of its more adverse factor then useful. If someone need any thing he/she can find it out by themself.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-06-24 | buiquan | 78 | view |
| 2024-03-27 | sunflower1190 | 73 | view |
| 2023-11-22 | tsln7607 | 84 | view |
| 2023-10-15 | Trandinhphuc8.0 | 78 | view |
| 2023-09-25 | Phuong1810 | 78 | view |
- The line graph below gives the information about the number of visitor to three London museums between Jun and September 2013 Summarize the information by reporting and selecting main features and make comparison where possible 73
- The map below is the town of Canterbury A new school S is planned for area The map shows two possible sites for school Summarized the main information and make comparison where possible 73
- Nowadays more and more people are using consumer goods such as refrigerators and washing machines Are there more advantages or disadvantages to this Give your own opinion and examples 89
- Local people don t go very often to museum or historical sites What can be done to change this situation Give reasons and example from relevant experience 84
- A big salary is much more important than job satisfaction Do you agree or disagree Provide relevant examples if necessary both important if required earning or reword then 95
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 124, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...s helpful for audience while some other dont agree with this point Both perspective ...
^^^^
Line 1, column 238, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'helps'?
Suggestion: helps
...r first group its beneficial because it help in searching potential things While oth...
^^^^
Line 3, column 75, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun thing seems to be countable; consider using: 'many things'.
Suggestion: many things
...s are not of any use the reason is that many thing that are not necessity of life or no ne...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 408, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'dumps'?
Suggestion: dumps
...ances and smart phone and people buy it dump off older one This thing is also leadin...
^^^^
Line 4, column 150, Rule ID: ANY_BODY[2]
Message: Did you mean 'Something'?
Suggestion: Something
...of people who think opposite each other Some thing it help us by saving time while other c...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 164, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'helps'?
Suggestion: helps
...think opposite each other Some thing it help us by saving time while other consider ...
^^^^
Line 4, column 346, Rule ID: LESS_MORE_THEN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'than'?
Suggestion: than
...cial because of its more adverse factor then useful If someone need any thing heshe ...
^^^^
Line 4, column 374, Rule ID: ANY_BODY[2]
Message: Did you mean 'anything'?
Suggestion: anything
...erse factor then useful If someone need any thing heshe can find it out by themself
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, second, so, then, while, for example, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1728.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 344.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02325581395 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30665032142 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58686305496 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.566860465116 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 558.9 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 5.43587174349 0% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 16.0721442886 6% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 344.0 20.2975951904 1695% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 49.4020404114 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 1728.0 106.682146367 1620% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 344.0 20.7667163134 1656% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 91.0 7.06120827912 1289% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.01903807615 159% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 8.67935871743 12% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.188476070557 0.244688304435 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.188476070557 0.084324248473 224% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0667982634062 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120270046883 0.151304729494 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0494581120091 0.056905535591 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 174.2 13.0946893788 1330% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -277.68 50.2224549098 -553% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 7.44779559118 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 137.4 11.3001002004 1216% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 13.32 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 24.55 8.58950901804 286% => Dale chall readability score is high.
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 59.0 9.78957915832 603% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 139.6 10.1190380762 1380% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 59.0 10.7795591182 547% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.