No one can deny that international sports activity and artistic works would not stand individually without the government's support. The question remains that should they be sponsored to Olympic teams or artistic creation. In my opinion, I staunchly believe that the government should support athletics rather than artwork because it requires an ample amount of money for maintenance.
To begin with, sports activity is the reflection of a particular country. Therefore, the triumph in the most popular games such as; badminton, cricket, soccer, football etc. make the individual country take pride. For instance, in 2016, a World cup cricket match was organized. In fact, everyone in the world kept their eyes on television for who will win the game. On the other hand, the United States did not participate in the match, so it was not in the light. Finally, after one month's waiting period, India won the finals. As a result, New Zealand, Australia, Swidan, Hong Kong all the counties would become familiar with the excellent fielding and batting ability of Indian batsmen through the news. If the government-sponsored, the whole county would they could take pride through not only cricket but also other Olympic athletics, who won the gold medal and shine in the global.
Furthermore, the equipment is quite expensive for athletics, so only a private company would not effort it. In other words, funds are required from the politic. Consequently, they can perform tasks efficiently. For example, last year's budget for a badminton match was around two million dollars. Since it requires a unique attire, rackets, sitting arrangements and other advertisers were needed money. Individual state and several international company's bills support made this event successful.
Moreover, sports activities make people physically fit and influence a fascinating appetite in their lifestyle. However, artistic works do not enhance individual life and need support from the government because it requires a small exhibition that can be sponsored by private companies.
In conclusion, although art can bring some optimistic feedback for the country, benefits achieved from athletics would accomplish admiration. As a result, sports inclined towards federal support. Aforementioned reasons, I acknowledge with the statement that investment in sports is more appropriate than art, so it should be on the first priority list.
- TPO 54 Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Governments should spend more money in support of the arts than in support of athletics such as state sponsored Olympic teams Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 68
- Nowadays many high schools and universities require students to work on projects in groups and all members of the group receive the same grade mark on the project Do you agree or disagree that giving every member of a group the same grade is a good way to 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 36, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'sports'' or 'sport's'?
Suggestion: sports'; sport's
No one can deny that international sports activity and artistic works would not s...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, finally, first, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, such as, as a result, in my opinion, in other words, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 43.0788530466 46% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 52.1666666667 63% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.0752688172 186% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2052.0 1977.66487455 104% => OK
No of words: 374.0 407.700716846 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.48663101604 4.8611393121 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3976220399 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93060813965 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 236.0 212.727598566 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.631016042781 0.524837075471 120% => OK
syllable_count: 617.4 618.680645161 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.59856630824 31% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.7769084219 48.9658058833 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.2173913043 100.406767564 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.2608695652 20.6045352989 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.91304347826 5.45110844103 182% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.193928317513 0.236089414692 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0478842822921 0.076458572812 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0563008981468 0.0737576698707 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118747101393 0.150856017488 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0707102155507 0.0645574589148 110% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 11.7677419355 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 58.1214874552 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.27 10.9000537634 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.99 8.01818996416 112% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 86.8835125448 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.