The bar chart
The bar chart gives information about the comparison of four different European countries relating to the amount of working hours every week in 2002.
Overall, it can be seen clearly from the chart that in France, people spent about 31-35 hours per week the most working for industry, as compared to other three countries spent about 36-40 hours the most working.
First of all, the proportion of 36-40 hours accounted the highest position in the charts of Denmark, Swenden and the UK, with 70%, 80% and 50% respectively. By contrast, the France people spent the most 31-35 working every week, with just above a half and nearly 40% for the percentage of 36-40 hours.
On the other hand, the proportion of the amount of 1-14 hours was the least in France and Swenden, with nearly 10% for both. In comparison with that of Denmark and the UK, the amount of 21-30 working hours was the least in Denmark, with about 9% and that of the UK accounted for 8% of the amount 15-20 working hours.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-10 | nobitaa | 78 | view |
| 2024-11-10 | nobitaa | 78 | view |
| 2024-11-04 | khanhkhanhlhp | view | |
| 2024-11-04 | khanhkhanhlhp | view | |
| 2024-11-04 | khanhkhanhlhp | view |
- The bar chart 67
- The table showing percentages of water use for domestic industrial and agriculture sectors in 6 countries in 2003 76
- The graphs below show the percentages of people using public transport and private cars in different cities in Australia between 2000 and 2010 73
- The tables below give the information a the temperatures and hours of daylight in two cities during the same weekend in May 2007 67
- The three pie charts below show the coffee production and consumption around the world and also the profit distribution Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisions where relevant 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 129, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: comparison,
...d Swenden, with nearly 10% for both. In comparison with that of Denmark and the UK, the am...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 318, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r 8% of the amount 15-20 working hours.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, so, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 821.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 175.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.69142857143 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63713576256 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.27480252563 2.65546596893 86% => OK
Unique words: 85.0 106.607317073 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.485714285714 0.547539520022 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 213.3 283.868780488 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 29.752684286 43.030603864 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.833333333 112.824112599 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.1666666667 22.9334400587 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.66666666667 5.23603664747 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.114472669555 0.215688989381 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0694195582474 0.103423049105 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0898652710294 0.0843802449381 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0942893441006 0.15604864568 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0943340406249 0.0819641961636 115% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.2329268293 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 75.88 61.2550243902 124% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.51 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.15 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 23.0 40.7170731707 56% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.