Cyclists and car drivers sharing the same roads causes some problems. What are the problems and what can be done to reduce them?Cyclists and car drivers sharing the same roads causes some problems. What are the problems and what can be done to reduce them?
It can not be denied that when car drivers and cyclists share the same roads, several dangerous situations would happen frequently. The major problem is the accidents caused by both car and bike users, which can be tackle with through government efforts to construct separate lane for each vehicles.
As we can see, a large number of accidents have occurred since cars and bikes joined in traffic in one road. The main reason is due to the disobedient of bikers to the traffic rules which led to many serious injuries for both vehicles users, especially cyclists, even when wearing a helmet for head protection. While bike users are sometimes responsible for causing accidents when they do not abide by the traffic laws, car drivers often fail to aware of other road users. For example, 2 years ago, one day my cousin rushed to school by bike in the rush hours because he woke up late. When he was going to pass a car which was slowing down, the car accidentally turned right, causing my cousin to crash into the back of the car. He fell and hit his head on the road, ending up with severe brain injuries. This story clearly illustrates how dangerous it is when cars and bikes travel in the same roads.
In my opinion, the best solution is for the authorities to create a separate lane which is solely for bicycles. This development will definitely bring huge advantages to both car drivers and cyclists since each vehicle has its own pathway for transit in its average speed and keeping a safe distance with each other. DBP street, for instance, was one of the first location which has been reconstructed to have a bicycle lane beside the lane for cars. The 5-meter road was divided in to 2 parts: 3 meters for cars and 2 meters for bikes and motorcycles. From then on, the residents hardly witnesses any accidents, besides, more and more people have chosen bike to commute to work or school because of the safety lane for cyclists.
In conclusion, from the reasons I mentioned above, I believe the idea that constructing special lane for cars and bicycles would help to avoid many severe problems.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-12-03 | nguyen duc | 78 | view |
- Some people believe that unpaid community service should be a compulsory part of high school programmes. To what extend do you agree or disagree? 78
- Some experts believe that it is better for children to begin learning a foreign language at primary school rather than secondary school. Do the advantages of this outweight the disadvantages? 73
- school expenditure and the proportion of students who gained higher education diplomas and degrees in Singapore from 2000 to 2012 67
- In recent years, the pressure of students in university is increasing and they are pushed to work hard from a young age. Do you think it is a positive or negative development? 61
- Divorce rates in Finland and Sweden
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 16, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...lane for each vehicles. As we can see, a large number of accidents have occurred since cars and ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 655, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to bike'
Suggestion: to bike
...sides, more and more people have chosen bike to commute to work or school because of...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, so, then, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1733.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 370.0 315.596192385 117% => OK
Chars per words: 4.68378378378 5.12529762239 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38581623665 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45726216072 2.80592935109 88% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 176.041082164 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.564864864865 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 540.0 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.739810987 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.533333333 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6666666667 20.7667163134 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.86666666667 7.06120827912 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.159105316506 0.244688304435 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0624086999476 0.084324248473 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0670059839778 0.0667982634062 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117922363015 0.151304729494 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.102843228652 0.056905535591 181% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 50.2224549098 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.16 12.4159519038 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.33 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.