The increasingly rapid pace of life today causes more problems than it solves.
Companies' defining argument for selling a product or a service, is by boasting of being faster than their competitors. Fast-food are prevalent worldwide, from children to retirees, one can't bear waiting for more than few seconds to be connected to social networks or pass phone-calls, people are now used to pay for the faster services ; and we all grow to be impatient and petulant. One should also stop and consider why most people from major cities are keen on going in bucolic and calm landscapes during holidays. Contemporary life is oppressing and raises many issues that weren't pressing in the past. Mental healths issues such as stress, anxiety and depression, leading sometimes to suicide, abound and increase along the celerity peculiar to current lifestyles.
We also live within a defining period, as it permits us to analyze how this rapid pace of life in which new generations are growing with, has subversively affected the eldest. It is indeed primordial to take into account the disparate idiosyncrasies between generations; and social researches draw a conclusion in which it is asserted that even the over 70 find wide merits in the race to innovations and technologies. The manner, however, in which this phenomenon prevents us from carving out strong personality's traits, is harmful. Life's rapid pace call into question the very essence of doing things, and circumscribes our tendency to reflect. Pragmatism has supplanted theory, and the meaning or surrounding of many behaviours and decisions are biased by the need for people to act and react immediately. Having the benefit of the insight is often precluded and the multitude of occurrences require us to have an opinion on all the topics, despite not being competent. While it is true that it is interesting for the majority to be aware of what's happening in another continent, it is a nonsense as we are not truly interested in what's happening in our own neighbour.
It is also essential to think about the major dilemma facing international institutions as well as many countries' ruling parties i.e exponential demographic growth, for this is heading our planet to be peopled by almost ten billion humans by 2050. In this regard, life has to be more rapid than it was fifty years before, and less than it will be in a century, insofar it mirrors our needs and demands. The vicious circle we entered since post-agrarian societies leads this debate to a defining juncture: Should we slow, due to the problems it causes, the social and economic process of contemporary world on the altar of our progresses and the needs it created?
It is undeniable that the race to innovation has permitted solving plethora of problems besieging people, that it has also grown to be essential in the development of many individuals, providing them with means for education or health care. However, this rapidity has solved many problems that have been created by it. For instance, many tumours are caused by the proximity between herbicide and humans as highlighted by the lawsuit opposing Monsanto and Dewayne Johnson, the result of the race to intensive farming.
As humanity evolves, problems ensue, but despite the shape of these vicissitudes being far different from those of centuries ago, many of these patterns saw the light of the day long time before the systemic issue addressed by the author. Past societies were faced with similar problems, and leaders with an avid desire of power; greed or competition, have always existed right from the time of Crusades. The increasingly pace of life style and the problems bound to it, is nothing more than the consequence of the human's essence.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-06-07 | batterylow_123 | 58 | view |
| 2024-06-07 | batterylow_123 | 58 | view |
| 2024-06-07 | batterylow_123 | 58 | view |
| 2023-10-20 | fstamim | 58 | view |
| 2023-10-01 | Aishwarya01 | 50 | view |
- The luxuries and conveniences of contemporary life prevent people from developing into truly strong and independent individuals 83
- Students should always question what they are taught instead of accepting it passively 83
- In any field of inquiry the beginner is more likely than the expert to make important contributions 92
- Students should memorize facts only after they have studied the ideas trends and concepts that help explain those facts 83
- Competition for high grades seriously limits the quality of learning at all levels of education 83
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 186, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...rldwide, from children to retirees, one cant bear waiting for more than few seconds ...
^^^^
Line 1, column 462, Rule ID: ON_GOING[1]
Message: Did you mean 'ongoing'?
Suggestion: ongoing
... most people from major cities are keen on going in bucolic and calm landscapes during h...
^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 579, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: weren't
... oppressing and raises many issues that werent pressing in the past. Mental healths is...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1046, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: what's
...resting for the majority to be aware of whats happening in another continent, it is a...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 1135, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: what's
...sense as we are not truly interested in whats happening in our own neighbour. It ...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 516, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'humans'' or 'human's'?
Suggestion: humans'; human's
...othing more than the consequence of the humans essence.
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, second, so, well, while, as to, for instance, such as, as well as, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 33.0 19.5258426966 169% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 12.4196629213 32% => OK
Conjunction : 28.0 14.8657303371 188% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 47.0 33.0505617978 142% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 92.0 58.6224719101 157% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3062.0 2235.4752809 137% => OK
No of words: 606.0 442.535393258 137% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.05280528053 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.96155895361 4.55969084622 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82049473355 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 335.0 215.323595506 156% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.552805280528 0.4932671777 112% => OK
syllable_count: 964.8 704.065955056 137% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 7.0 1.77640449438 394% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 23.0359550562 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 56.5664179279 60.3974514979 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 145.80952381 118.986275619 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.8571428571 23.4991977007 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.80952380952 5.21951772744 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 5.13820224719 195% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.216735914535 0.243740707755 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0647473985758 0.0831039109588 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0884559843307 0.0758088955206 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114595297152 0.150359130593 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0296859671094 0.0667264976115 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 14.1392134831 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.06 48.8420337079 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 12.1743820225 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.6 12.1639044944 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.92 8.38706741573 118% => OK
difficult_words: 188.0 100.480337079 187% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.8971910112 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 11.2143820225 118% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.