Safety standards are important when people build homes. Who are responsible for this- the government or the people who build the homes?
Safety is the most desired thing in anyone’s life. Every activity we do, we make sure the safety for ourselves. More importantly, people consider their home as the safest place on this earth. For the reason being, I will be in accord with the statement that government should be the one to impose strict safety code for building people’s home rather than people who are making constructing the home. But some may contradict with the statement.
The responsibility implies on the people to ensure the safety code for their home. Bur three are some limitations regarding ensuring the safety because of corruption and lack of accountability. There are some developers who construct houses on contractual basis. Sometimes, they build the residence with lower quality materials. As a result, the sustainability of the building becomes uncertain. Furthermore, once they finish the work as per the contract and handover the house to the owner, they are no longer accountable to anyone for anything. Hence there is no scope for them to make amends for their mistake.
On the other hand, safety code should be enforced by government because of the international reputation and economic development. Government has a reputation to maintain in front of other countries and a country’s reputation also includes the matter of safety. For instance, the incident of Rana Plaza took place in Savar shook the status of Bangladesh to other countries. Thousands of people lost their life and a lot of people have lost their workability. Moreover, when an incident happens and there is a damage of people’s property, government have to pay compensation for the damage. If strict rules had been imposed by government, it would be possible to avoid this extra burden on the economy and use the amount for the betterment of other sector of the country.
In conclusion, I harmonize with the statement that government has a bigger role to play than individuals in setting the strict rules for safety.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-12-06 | tahmeed1993 | 67 | view |
- To be an effective leader, a public official must maintain the highest ethical and moral standards. 56
- You have recently got involved in a car accident and there was damage to both your car and your health. Fortunately you have both car premium insurance as well as health insurance. Write a letter to the insurance manager:Explaining your membership details 75
- Placing a limit on classroom size is the best way to ensure that every student gets sufficient help andresources from the instructor. 66
- Many believe that individuals can do little to improve the environment Only governments and large companies can make a real difference To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- The line graph compares figures for unemployment in America and Japan over a period of six years Overall the unemployment rate was higher in Japan compared to the the US However the proportion of workplace in japan rose steadily between March 1993 and Mar 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 548, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...ger accountable to anyone for anything. Hence there is no scope for them to make amen...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 506, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'damage'.
Suggestion: damage
..., when an incident happens and there is a damage of people’s property, government have t...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, hence, if, may, moreover, regarding, so, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1665.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 326.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10736196319 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24917287072 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91341451167 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.542944785276 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 533.7 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.9325132607 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.6315789474 106.682146367 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1578947368 20.7667163134 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.52631578947 7.06120827912 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.38160033486 0.244688304435 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100695243994 0.084324248473 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.102512089567 0.0667982634062 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.209807591845 0.151304729494 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.118741832426 0.056905535591 209% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.06 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.65 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.