The charts illustrate changes in the number of zebras and buffalos and how much annual rainwater fell at the Nboro Nature Reserve in 2005, 2007, 2009, and 2011.
Overall, while the annual precipitation in Nboro Nature Reserve obtained a significant fluctuation, the numbers of 2 given wild animals had upward trends in the span of six years.
Looking closely at the figures for animal species, there was a dramatic increase in the number of buffalos from 2005 to 2009, at 40 and nearly 115, respectively. Then the figure of buffalos rose marginally to approximately 118 in the year of 2011. Apart from a slight decrease of roughly 5 between 2007 and 2011, a similar uptrend also happened in the zebras' population. It started and ended respectively at more than 50 and 81 from 2005 to 2011.
Regarding the annual rainfall, it stood at more than 630 millimeters in 2005 then this figure grew considerably to almost 1100 millimeters in 2007. In the year 2009, the amount of rainwater declined more than half of that in 2007, at 700 millimeters. However, the precipitation surged again and ended at 1200 millimeters at the end of the period.
- In Many parts of the world today, there is a profitable market for products which lightens the skin.Outline the reasons for using such products and discuss the effect they have in terms of health and society. 61
- Some people think that there should be some strict controls about noise. Others think that they could just make as much noise as they want. Discuss both views and give your opinion 56
- The gap between the rich and the poor is becoming richer and the poor are growing poorer. What are the causes of this? what measures can be taken to reduce this problem? 73
- The charts below show information about animals and rainfall at the Nboro Nature Reserve Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The charts below show information about animals and rainfall at the Nboro Nature Reserve Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 100
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, look, regarding, so, then, while, apart from
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 954.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 195.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89230769231 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73687570622 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79992486046 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.558974358974 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 275.4 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.6820665957 43.030603864 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.0 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6666666667 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.23603664747 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.118102679517 0.215688989381 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0513045679167 0.103423049105 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0440942213339 0.0843802449381 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0867418580891 0.15604864568 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0359928046022 0.0819641961636 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.24 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.