Line graph
The provided line graph delineates the amount of stolen cars per thousand vehicles in Britain, Sweden, France and Canada over the period of nine years commencing from 1990. A glance at the chart reveals that car thefts were far higher in Great Britain than in the other three counties throughout the whole time frame.
It is explicitly viewed that the highest number of car theft accounts for England. In the first 3 years rate had increased gradually, but then started falling after reaching 20 000 and bottomed out during 1993. In 1996 it regained its position and dropped over the last 3 years. In terms of Sweden rate, it experienced steady but significant rise and reached its peak in 1999 in slightly less than 15000. In contrast, the proportion of cars which were stolen in Canada and France dropped fractionally with some fluctuations. They both witnessed gradual fall until 1993. However France rate crept up then tailed off after 4 years, While number of theft in Canada saw hardly noticeable increase and both stood at 6000 in last year. Car thefts in Sweden, France and Canada followed a fairly similar numbers over the first five years, all remaining at between 5 and 10 per thousand
- The diagrams below show the existing ground floor plan of a house and a proposed plan for some building work Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- Competitiveness is regarded as a positive quality for people in most societies How does competitiveness affect individuals Is it a positive or negative trend 89
- Some people think that cities are the best places to live Compare the advantages and disadvantages of living in the city 89
- The diagrams below show the existing ground floor plan of a house and a proposed plan for some building work Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The diagrams below show the existing ground floor plan of a house and a proposed plan for some building work
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 256, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...996 it regained its position and dropped over the last 3 years. In terms of Swede...
^^
Line 3, column 281, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ion and dropped over the last 3 years. In terms of Sweden rate, it experienced st...
^^
Line 3, column 407, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ak in 1999 in slightly less than 15000. In contrast, the proportion of cars which ...
^^
Line 3, column 554, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...luctuations. They both witnessed gradual fall until 1993. However France rate cre...
^^
Line 3, column 573, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...oth witnessed gradual fall until 1993. However France rate crept up then tailed off af...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 704, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... saw hardly noticeable increase and both stood at 6000 in last year. Car thefts ...
^^
Line 3, column 714, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y noticeable increase and both stood at 6000 in last year. Car thefts in Sweden,...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, so, then, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 997.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 205.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.86341463415 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78388967377 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.39752003538 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 132.0 106.607317073 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.643902439024 0.547539520022 118% => OK
syllable_count: 280.8 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.4055833607 43.030603864 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.7 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.3 5.23603664747 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 2.0 3.83414634146 52% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 7.0 1.69756097561 412% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0597071321075 0.215688989381 28% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0224928448644 0.103423049105 22% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0674785345933 0.0843802449381 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0767127677126 0.15604864568 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0767127677126 0.0819641961636 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.48 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.