There is a debate about what school lecture is the most significant. Some people opine that History is the most crucial, where others believe that Science and Technology subjects are most significant school subjects. I completely agree with both views that both lectures are equally important because of several reasons.
On the one side, History is a lecture which teaches students about past occurrences. These past events can include wars, colonialism, and independence. From these past occurrences, there are usually a lot of life values which can be learned by students. For example, as a Indonesian, I was taught about the struggle of Indonesia troops to reach Indonesia's independence during History lesson. From that story, I can learn about being resilient when striving to get something that we dream for. Even though it is taken from past events, the moral values are still applicable for my current life.
On the other side, Science and Technology subjects are related to things that will happen in the future. Science mainly explains how things work which gives us basic in understanding how future invention works. Whereas, Technology mostly teaches us about operating newest technology inventions to help us solving everyday issues. By learning those lessons, students will be able to understand and operate the future technology inventions, thus those they can enjoy the benefits from those future technology inventions. For instance, I was taught about how to compute using Microsoft Excel software during Information Technology lesson in my elementary school. Several years later, when I entered university, I was asked to solve complex calculations using more complex software named e-Views. Because I have learned the Microsoft Excel lesson on elementary school, I was able to operate e-Views without faced much difficulty. The Microsoft Excel lesson has become a basic in understanding more complex software in my future life.
In conclusion, both History and Science and Technology subjects are equally significant because History teaches students about past events which contain a lot of moral values which are still relevant in today's life. Whereas, Science and Technology subjects are preparing students to understand and operate the future technology inventions.
- At the present time the population of some countries includes a relatively large number of young adults compared with the number of older people Do you think that the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages 67
- The plans below show the layout of a university s sports centre now and how it will look after redevelopment 78
- In a number of countries some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing railway lines for very fast trains between cities Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport Discuss both these vi 67
- Some people say History is one of the most important school subjects Other people think that in today s world subjects like science and technology are more important than history Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 61
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and 2010 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 271, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...be learned by students. For example, as a Indonesian, I was taught about the stru...
^
Line 5, column 212, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...derstanding how future invention works. Whereas, Technology mostly teaches us about ope...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 306, Rule ID: ADVISE_VBG[9]
Message: The verb 'help' is used with infinitive: 'to solve' or 'solve'.
Suggestion: to solve; solve
...newest technology inventions to help us solving everyday issues. By learning those less...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, still, thus, whereas, for example, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1943.0 1615.20841683 120% => OK
No of words: 354.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.48870056497 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33761313653 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76671950608 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.497175141243 0.561755894193 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 617.4 506.74238477 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.9046135509 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.263157895 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6315789474 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.68421052632 7.06120827912 52% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.237978828697 0.244688304435 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0765033372637 0.084324248473 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0821412490596 0.0667982634062 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.17681453599 0.151304729494 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.10922200988 0.056905535591 192% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.56 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.