The graph illustrates three major problems faced by the United Kingdom population in 5 major cities in the year 2008. The issues reported are on the Health Services, education and training sector and air pollution.
Overall, the most number of complaints are received on the heath services and the education and training sectors in all the 5 cities. Belfast has the highest percentage of problems regarding the health services, whereas cities like Glasgow and London face the highest percentage of problems on the education and training. However, air pollution is the least concern in all the cities compared to the other two issues.
Belfast has the highest percentage of reported cases regarding the health services (nearly 60%) followed by Cardiff and Birmingham with over 55% and 50% respectively. In terms of the problems reported in the field of education and training, around 55 percentage of population in Glasgow and London suffers this issue and at the same time, Manchester has the least percentage of reported.
It is evident from the graph that less than 20% of the population in all the 5 cities are bothered about the air pollution. Only 5% of the residents in Newcastle had complaints on the air pollution which is roughly one-third of the population who reported the same issue in Manchester.
- The chart below gives some of the most reported issues among people living in UK cities in 2008 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 61
- The graph below shows the number of trips made by children in one country to travel to school in 1990 and 2010 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant 67
- Advances in science and technology and other areas of society in the last 100 years have transformed the way we live as well as postponing the day we die There is no better time to be alive than now To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinio
- The charts below show local government expenditure in 2010 and 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The chart below shows the places visited by different people living in Canada Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 72
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, regarding, third, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 3.97073170732 302% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1095.0 965.302439024 113% => OK
No of words: 216.0 196.424390244 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06944444444 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.83365862548 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74926336935 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.476851851852 0.547539520022 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 328.5 283.868780488 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.8748040748 43.030603864 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.666666667 112.824112599 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.22222222222 5.23603664747 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 1.13902439024 439% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.1251148104 0.215688989381 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0564064815708 0.103423049105 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0297607184552 0.0843802449381 35% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0818509767226 0.15604864568 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0215810052805 0.0819641961636 26% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.2329268293 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.48 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.