Definite part of the world’s population considers that technologies like mobile phones are degrading reciprocity between people in society. In this essay I will write about points for and against this concept and in the end give my own opinion.
It is not difficult to note that large quantity of people consumes mobile phones as adults, likewise and children. Mobile phones are very necessary and compulsory for each person. For instance, there are such situations when we need to send photography of something or somebody to a person who resides on the other side of the world. Technologies help us make contact with relatives or close people not only by voice calls but and by video calls. It is very available and convenient for most people. Besides connecting with other people mobile phones can serve as books for booklovers. For example, who likes books very much especially books of foreign writers it is very profitable and readily to download very different and readable books written by various authors from the whole world. It does not require any amount of money and it is very fast procedure. In addition, it is optional and permissive to lost time to looking for needful and indispensable books.
However, technologies not always weal and benefit for people, specifically for children. Firstly, mobile phones are wasting of our valuable and essential time. People cannot observe how their time passed when they use telephone. Secondly, they begin prefer to communicate with people virtually with help of the internet. For example, they become more introvert and uncommunicative in real society. Thirdly, mobile phones are harmful and pernicious for children. They play a lot of games and waste their time that they could spend for studying or pastime with friends in real life. They become dependent on telephones. Moreover, it is adverse and bad for health of young exactly for their eyes as well earphones are also harmful and deleterious for ears.
To conclude, I agree with given idea that mobile phones are destroy our interplay with society. It will be better if we appreciate our real and live communication with our close and significant people than virtual box.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-12-15 | Садуш Йулдашева | 56 | view |
- This century is century of technologies based on this now the internet influences on people s lives on the score of that it is more desired than TV broadcasts I concur with this thought therefore in this essay I will write about positive and negative side 56
- Some people think that artists demand a definite liberty to improve their abilities others consider that they should have full freedom to signify their imagination and talents In this essay I am going to narrate about both types of people and in the end g 56
- Some people consider that working in favorite profession is more substantial and great than earning much money whereas others regard satisfactory wages is more significant than lovely work In this essay I am going to assimilate both types of people and th 56
- Definite part of the world s population considers that technologies like mobile phones are degrading reciprocity between people in society In this essay I will write about points for and against this concept and in the end give my own opinion 56
- In today s world children are indolent supine and passive in their leisure time than in backward accordingly physical training must be obligatory in schools There are points for and against this idea so in this essay I will write about both sides and give 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 61, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'destroyed'.
Suggestion: destroyed
... with given idea that mobile phones are destroy our interplay with society. It will be ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, firstly, however, if, likewise, look, moreover, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, well, for example, for instance, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 10.4138276553 211% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1626.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 320.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08125 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22948505376 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66750556466 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56875 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 519.3 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 5.43587174349 202% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.6854083167 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.3 106.682146367 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.0 20.7667163134 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.85 7.06120827912 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.38176352705 68% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 3.4128256513 264% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.156728498513 0.244688304435 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0538014536256 0.084324248473 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0349035934646 0.0667982634062 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101448748484 0.151304729494 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0316311746378 0.056905535591 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.0946893788 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.57 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.