Some people think that schools should choose students according to their academic abilities, while others think it is better to have students of different abilities studying together. Discuss both views and give your own opinion?
Schools often group students by age, and a classroom ordinarily comprises members of diverse abilities. However, I think sorting individuals by their competence is more effective for both teachers and learners.
On the one hand, the gap between students’ academic agility in a classroom can create a supportive and motivational studying environment. Particularly, students with better learning capability have chances to help their classmates while slower students can also be motivated by competing with their peers. This mutual interaction might cultivate their friendship and positively affect their studying outcomes in the long run. Besides, it is quicker and simpler for educational institutions to design courses without having to carrying out placement tests or worrying about learners’ academic disparity.
Nevertheless, I am convinced that specialized schools provide greater benefits for both instructors and students. Firstly, faculties are able to offer consistent curriculums for students of similar ability of knowledge acquisition, and teachers can concentrate on their lessons, hence a faster and more productive teaching process. Secondly, an environment in which people with the same academic levels are gathered together might reduce the conflicts between members. For example, if the programs are relatively easy for some students while appear to be challenging for the others, it will be likely to widen the academic distinction an create the unpleasantness among them. Such academic gap can be bridged when students are arranged based on their performance in advance of the courses.
Overall, mixed ability classes can promote a competitive atmosphere that motivate students, but I think organizing classes based on students’ levels is more efficient for both teachers and learners.
- Living in a country where you have to speak a foreign language can cause serious social problems, as well as practical problems 78
- Films were produced by big companies in the past but today people are able to make a film Do you think this trend is positive or negative 89
- In the modern world it is no longer necessary to use animals for food,clothing or medicine. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Give reasons for your answer and include examples from your own experience. 78
- Some people think that children should begin their formal education at a very early age. Some think they should begin at least 7 years old. Discuss both views give opinions ? 89
- Some people say that the main aim of advertising is to improve the sales of products that people do not really need To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 636, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...ikely to widen the academic distinction an create the unpleasantness among them. S...
^^
Line 5, column 636, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...ikely to widen the academic distinction an create the unpleasantness among them. Such aca...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 723, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...cademic gap can be bridged when students are arranged based on their performance ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, firstly, hence, however, if, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, while, for example, i think
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1555.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 266.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.84586466165 5.12529762239 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03850299372 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05368004884 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.627819548872 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 480.6 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.089136794 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.583333333 106.682146367 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1666666667 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.91666666667 7.06120827912 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.274885474397 0.244688304435 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.095059248397 0.084324248473 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.03564536807 0.0667982634062 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.162871316266 0.151304729494 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0188505613121 0.056905535591 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 13.0946893788 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 50.2224549098 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.65 12.4159519038 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.6 8.58950901804 123% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.