The given pie charts illustrate the percentage of generated electric power in Germany and France from all kinds of resources and renewables in 2009.
As it is shown on both pie charts, all sources' (that consisted of conventional thermal, nuclear and renewables) percent indicators were noticeably different for both countries, as well as the amount of electric energy: for Germany-560 billion kWh, for France-510 billion kWh. Similarly, parts of renewables showed various statistics as well.
According to the pie chart that describes Germany's electropower,conventional thermal took the biggest place,indicating 59,6% of all resources.Nuclear and renewables came at second and third place, showing 23,0 and 17,4% respectively. Renewables themselves were divided into 5 parts accordingly: biomass -39,3%, wind-36,9%, hydroelectric-17,7%, solar-6,1% and geothermal-0,0%.
It is apparent from the second pie chart,related to France, that, in contrast with Germany, nuclear was the greatest source with 76%. Renewables and and conventional thermal followed successively,pointing 13,7 and 10,3% relatively. The consistence of renewables of France noticeably contrasted Germany's. To illustrate that, hydroelectric occupied the hugest space hitting the point of 80,5%, in comparison with biomass(8,1%), wind(10,5%), solar(0,9%) and geothermal(0,0%).
- In some countries owning a home rather than renting one is very important for people Why might this be the case Do you think this is a positive or negative situation 73
- The pie charts show the electricity generated in Germany and France from all sources and renewables in 2009 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 Words 84
- The graph below shows the number of tourists visiting a particular Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Many people are afraid to leave their home because of crime Some believe that more action should be taken to prevent crime While others feel that little action can be done to stop crime What is your view 73
- The chart below shows the results of a survey about people s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main feature and make comparisons where relevant 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 176, Rule ID: BOTH_AS_WELL_AS[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'and' after 'both'.
Suggestion: and
...oticeably different for both countries, as well as the amount of electric energy: for Germ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 64, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , conventional
...art that describes Germanys electropower,conventional thermal took the biggest place,indicati...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 108, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , indicating
...ventional thermal took the biggest place,indicating 59,6% of all resources.Nuclear and rene...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 143, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Nuclear
...place,indicating 59,6% of all resources.Nuclear and renewables came at second and third...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 41, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , related
...It is apparent from the second pie chart,related to France, that, in contrast with Germa...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 146, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: and
...he greatest source with 76%. Renewables and and conventional thermal followed successiv...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 196, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , pointing
...nventional thermal followed successively,pointing 13,7 and 10,3% relatively. The consiste...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, if, second, similarly, so, third, well, in contrast, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1158.0 965.302439024 120% => OK
No of words: 184.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.29347826087 4.92477711251 128% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68302321012 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.95244355038 2.65546596893 149% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 106.607317073 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.635869565217 0.547539520022 116% => OK
syllable_count: 317.7 283.868780488 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 79.2728673633 43.030603864 184% => OK
Chars per sentence: 144.75 112.824112599 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.5 5.23603664747 181% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 1.69756097561 412% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.259407693781 0.215688989381 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109629964226 0.103423049105 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0924354592734 0.0843802449381 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.174417485589 0.15604864568 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0867745425312 0.0819641961636 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.7 13.2329268293 149% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 61.2550243902 65% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 6.51609756098 200% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.3012195122 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 19.5 11.4140731707 171% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.93 8.06136585366 123% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 40.7170731707 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 21.0 11.4329268293 184% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 20.0 11.0658536585 181% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.