The pie charts show the electricity generated in Germany and France from all sources and renewables in 2009.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
Write at least 150 Words.
The pie charts show the electricity generated in Germany and France from all sources and renewables in 2009.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
Write at least 150 Words.
The pie charts compare the main energy sources in two European countries, France and Germany, in 2009, with further detail provided regarding the use of renewable energy.
In 2009, Germany’s electricity generation was higher (560 Billion kWh) as compared to France (510 Billion kWh). The most striking feature is that France relied on nuclear power to supply 75% of its energy demands, while Germany relied mainly on conventional thermal energy, providing almost 60% of the electricity. Nuclear energy featured at only 23% in Germany.
Both countries used renewable energies to a similar extent in 2009, with France relying on green energy for 13.7% of its demands and Germany for 17.4%. However, the make up of the renewable energy sector differed greatly between the two countries. While France relied mainly on hydroelectric energy energy (80.5%), Germany had a more diverse portfolio with biomass and wind providing almost equal proportions of energy (39.3% and 36.9% respectively), followed by hydroelectric at 17.7%. Solar power featured only minimally in both countries, with 6.1% and 0.9% of the renewable shares in Germany and France respectively.
To sum up, Germany generated more energy than France in 2009. Moreover, the energy sources that Germany relied on were much more diverse than those in France.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-12-17 | Khakimova KhA | 84 | view |
- As most people spend a major part of their adult life at work, job satisfaction is an important element of individual well-being.What factors contribute to job satisfaction? How realistic is the expectation of job satisfaction for all workers? 78
- Do the dangers derived from the use of chemicals in food production and preservation outweigh the advantages?Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own experience or knowledge.Write at least 250 words. 56
- Space exploration is much too expensive and the money should be spent on more important things.Do you agree or disagree? 78
- When a country develops its technology, the traditional skills and ways of life die out. It is pointless to try to keep them alive. To what extend do you agree or disagree? 67
- The pie charts show the electricity generated in Germany and France from all sources and renewables in 2009 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 Words 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 293, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: energy
...e France relied mainly on hydroelectric energy energy 80.5%, Germany had a more diverse portf...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 72, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...re energy than France in 2009. Moreover, the energy sources that Germany relied o...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, moreover, regarding, so, while, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1116.0 965.302439024 116% => OK
No of words: 207.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.39130434783 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79308509922 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69907838986 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.570048309179 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 335.7 283.868780488 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 81.0278111073 43.030603864 188% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.0 112.824112599 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.23603664747 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 3.70975609756 243% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.190737012436 0.215688989381 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0961079905594 0.103423049105 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0444170539412 0.0843802449381 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137662910574 0.15604864568 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0242804315553 0.0819641961636 30% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.2329268293 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 61.2550243902 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.28 11.4140731707 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.05 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 40.7170731707 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.