tpo17
The reading claims that the steady growth of the human population and the corresponding increase in agriculture and pesticide use have caused much harm to wildlife in the United States birds and result that the number of birds will decline. It provides three reasons of support. In contrast, the professor states that the arguments in the passage are unconvincing and she refutes each of the author's reasons.
First, the article asserts that as human population and settlements continue to expand, birds' natural habitats will continue to disappear. However, the lecturer opposes this point by saying that the settlement is bad to some type of birds. In fact, this settlement provides more habitats to other species, and a lot of birds population such as penguins is in streets. In addition, we can see whox in cities and others in roads. So there is no decline in birds population and some birds are abundant in cities.
Second, the passage posits that the growth of agriculture will also result in the further destruction of bird habitats as more and more wilderness areas are converted to agriculture use. On the other hand, the professor counters this point by stating that it is ture that agriculture activities increased but they art not destructive for bird habitats. Actually, In the United States less and less land used for agriculture purpose because many agriculture products are introduced variaty crops in small area and because of these crops, there is no need to destroy lands for growing crops.
Third, the article avers that the use of chemical pesticides will increase and will affect the population of the birds since they are poisonous to them. Conversely, the professor casts doubt on this point by explaining that the people aware abot he toxicity of pesticides and they made two changes. The first one is they use less pesticides and the toxicity decrease. the second change is they grow crops that resist to pesticides and this pesticides resistant crops helps people to reduce using pesiticides
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-08-29 | heartqq | 80 | view |
| 2020-03-01 | eeemmmyyy | 80 | view |
| 2019-11-03 | sahar90o | 73 | view |
| 2019-10-24 | aldovega0516 | 80 | view |
| 2019-10-02 | Mostafa93106325 | 83 | view |
- Essay topic: Some people prefer to eat at food stands or restaurants. Other people prefer to prepare and eat food at home. Which do you prefer? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement For success in a future job the ability to relate well to people is more important than studying hard in schools 94
- warming trend 80
- The disappearance of Roanake 90
- TPO30 80
less and less land used for agriculture purpose
less and less lands are used for agriculture purpose
The first one is they use less pesticides
The first one is that they use less pesticides
the second change is they grow crops
the second change is that they grow crops
people aware abot he toxicity of pesticides
people aware about the toxicity of pesticides
Sentence: In addition, we can see whox in cities and others in roads.
Error: whox Suggestion: whom
Sentence: On the other hand, the professor counters this point by stating that it is ture that agriculture activities increased but they art not destructive for bird habitats.
Error: ture Suggestion: No alternate word
Sentence: Actually, In the United States less and less land used for agriculture purpose because many agriculture products are introduced variaty crops in small area and because of these crops, there is no need to destroy lands for growing crops.
Error: variaty Suggestion: variety
Sentence: Conversely, the professor casts doubt on this point by explaining that the people aware abot he toxicity of pesticides and they made two changes.
Error: abot Suggestion: about
Sentence: The first one is they use less pesticides and the toxicity decrease. the second change is they grow crops that resist to pesticides and this pesticides resistant crops helps people to reduce using pesiticides
Error: pesiticides Suggestion: pesticide
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 24 in 30
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 4 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 5 2
No. of Sentences: 14 12
No. of Words: 334 250
No. of Characters: 1657 1200
No. of Different Words: 164 150
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.275 4.2
Average Word Length: 4.961 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.6 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 116 80
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 89 60
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 63 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 39 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 23.857 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 9.425 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.857 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.336 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.571 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.116 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 4