Although significant progress has been made in recent decades, human society is still facing wars, violence, and conflicts. It is also obvious that current world leaders are still male predominating, resulting in the perception that with more female leaders, the world would be more peaceful. Such a proposal appears to be superficial, although it also implies some positive effects.
To begin with, this suggestion is based on a false assumption, that female politicians are more compassionate and peaceful. In fact, although females generally tend to have these calming personality features, it is not uncommon that female leaders have to be as tough as male counterparts, even tougher than them, in order to survive in the political world, an extremely challenging business with extensive stress and pressure. One of the major reasons that Hillary Clinton lost the US presidential election was that the voters were not impressed by her aggressive foreign policies, which may provoke another Gulf War.
Furthermore, it is very likely for the female leaders sometimes to make emotional decisions leading to contrary and negative consequences, like violence and conflicts, despite the fact that they are from good intentions. The current President of Germany is a well-known female leader who generously opened her loving arms and welcomed all refugees rushing into Germany. Unfortunately, the by-product of this so-called humanistic policy was numerous criminals, robbers and murderers also pouring into this peaceful nation, causing a dramatic rise in violence and severe criminals.
On the other hand, I agree that the roles of female leaders in politics are not deniable, because they are more collaborative and considerable. When there raise intense arguments and negotiation, they are great issues coordinators to help de-escalate tension. However, this does not necessarily mean that the female leaders will bring more peace or less violence to our world than the males.
In sum, I believe that only focusing on having more female leaders is too tunnel-visioned to be the key solution for wars and violence. What the world really needs is to have every single citizen proactively and heavily involved in making our earth more beautiful and our societies more peaceful.
- In the past the main role of teachers was providing information Today with various sources of information available to students teachers have no role in modern education To what extent do you agree or disagree 95
- Many people prefer to watch foreign films rather than locally produced films Why could this be Should governments give more financial support to local film industries 89
- The diagram below shows City Park before and after a swimming pool was constructed Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisions where relevant 69
- Some people think that our behaviour customs and traditions are no longer relevant and have to change due to the influence of modern ways of life Do you agree or disagree Include any relevant examples in your response 95
- Some think that all entertainment TV programmes should educate people about the importance of social issues To what extent do you agree or disagree 86
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 298, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...utiful and our societies more peaceful.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, however, if, may, really, so, still, well, as to, in fact, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 13.1623246493 167% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1935.0 1615.20841683 120% => OK
No of words: 355.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.45070422535 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34067318298 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90855949051 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 222.0 176.041082164 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.625352112676 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 619.2 506.74238477 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 52.7479567261 49.4020404114 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.214285714 106.682146367 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.3571428571 20.7667163134 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.85714285714 7.06120827912 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.201859535812 0.244688304435 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0671256318852 0.084324248473 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0539638217074 0.0667982634062 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110100319157 0.151304729494 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0222198245596 0.056905535591 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 13.0946893788 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.63 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.95 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 114.0 78.4519038076 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 298, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...utiful and our societies more peaceful.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, however, if, may, really, so, still, well, as to, in fact, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 13.1623246493 167% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1935.0 1615.20841683 120% => OK
No of words: 355.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.45070422535 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34067318298 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90855949051 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 222.0 176.041082164 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.625352112676 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 619.2 506.74238477 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 52.7479567261 49.4020404114 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.214285714 106.682146367 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.3571428571 20.7667163134 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.85714285714 7.06120827912 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.201859535812 0.244688304435 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0671256318852 0.084324248473 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0539638217074 0.0667982634062 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110100319157 0.151304729494 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0222198245596 0.056905535591 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 13.0946893788 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.63 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.95 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 114.0 78.4519038076 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.