Shops should not be allowed to sell any food and drink that has been scientifically proved to be bad for people's health. To what extent do you agree or disagree ?
For the past few decades, people have shown a great interest towards unhealthy cousins and soft drinks. It is said that local shops are highly responsible for this trend and thus, these outlets should not be permitted to freely sell such scientifically proven detrimental things. In my opinion, it is a wise decision to control over consumption of food and drinks that have an adverse effect on individuals. This essay will discuss the view in further paragraphs.
To begin with, it is commonly seen that many people, nowadays, have become habitual of locally available, scientifically un-proved foods which can cause serious or even deadly health related issues like poisoning and they avail such meals from their nearby shops. The easy availability of these things make them to consume more outdoor foods on a routine basis. Thus, the government should ban the shops those sales these sorts of food or drinks nearby societies. Apart from that, these illegal foods and drinks are mostly purchased by youngsters and children, which make them physically un-fit, so related authorities can provide a license number of local shops to prohibit the selling of such foods and drinks.
Furthermore, it is also a fundamental duty of shope+keppers to avoid selling foods and drinks which have an adverse affect on health because these meals and artificial drinks contains some chemicals based ingredients such as Ajinomoto, caffeine which can be a reason for the bad health of youngsters and other people too. For instance, in India, an instant noodles brand 'Maggie' was banned recently by FSSCI as it contains harmful ingredients. Also, shopkeepers should sell other scientifically checked foods and drinks publicly.
To conclude, by considering the detrimental effects of such foods on an individual's health, the government should not permit to shops to sell these harmful foods and drinks.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-12-28 | shubhamsingh | 76 | view |
- Shops should not be allowed to sell any food and drink that has been scientifically proved to be bad for people s health To what extent do you agree or disagree 76
- City planners new designs include setting up schools markets and commercial places like offices in different areas of the city Do you think it will help the city dwellers 48
- Some people think that art is an essential subject for children at school while others think it is a waste of time Discuss both sides and give your opinion 61
- In some countries a few people earn extremely high salaries Some people think that this is good for a country while others believe that the government should control salaries and limit the amount people can earn Discuss both views and give your opinion 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 117, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'effect'?
Suggestion: effect
... foods and drinks which have an adverse affect on health because these meals and artifici...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 73, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'individuals'' or 'individual's'?
Suggestion: individuals'; individual's
...detrimental effects of such foods on an individuals health, the government should not permi...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, if, so, thus, apart from, for instance, such as, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1586.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 302.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25165562914 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1687104957 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74687585437 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.572847682119 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 468.0 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 78.7827533298 49.4020404114 159% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.166666667 106.682146367 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.1666666667 20.7667163134 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.06120827912 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.280110959648 0.244688304435 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10308595237 0.084324248473 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0694812633408 0.0667982634062 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.179653732144 0.151304729494 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0358583687282 0.056905535591 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 50.2224549098 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.47 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.22 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.