The bar graph demonstrates participants who took part in Olympics in four different years and line graph illustrates number of athletes who took part in Olympics in timespan of 88 years. The scale is in thousands.
Overall, it can be observed that number of participants in both gender were increased gradually. While, number of male participants were more compared to women although number of participants grew dramatically throughout the period.
To begin with, number of male participants around 3000 in year of 1924. Where, female participants were less or can be say that negligible. Furthermore, in 1952, male participants were inclined slowly around 4100 and female participants were also increased compared to former year, nearly 500. In 1984, male athletes grew dramatically nearly 5100 and woman participant were also doubled compared to previous year. Whereas, male athletes surged up roughly 6000 in 2012. Whereas, female participants were almost tripled compared the year 1952.
Moreover, there were nearly 3000 participants were took part in Olympics, in 1924, Which rise gradually up-to 5000 in 1952 and 6200 in 1984. Then after, athletes who participated were peaked up in 2012, to 10,000.
- The line graph below shows changes in the amount of fast food eaten by teenagers from Australia for 1975 to 2000 61
- The chart below show the main reasons for study among students of different age groups and the amount of support they are received from employers 67
- The pie chart below shows the percentage of households income distributed in different categories 85
- The charts below show the proportions of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English in 2000 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make compari
- The graph below shows the number of tourists visiting a particular Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 414, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...also doubled compared to previous year. Whereas, male athletes surged up roughly 6000 i...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 469, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...thletes surged up roughly 6000 in 2012. Whereas, female participants were almost trip...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 502, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... 2012. Whereas, female participants were almost tripled compared the year 1952. ...
^^^
Line 4, column 52, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'taken'.
Suggestion: taken
...here were nearly 3000 participants were took part in Olympics, in 1924, Which rise g...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, if, moreover, so, then, whereas, while, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1020.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 189.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.39682539683 4.92477711251 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70779275107 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92210108127 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.544973544974 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 297.0 283.868780488 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.0785579726 43.030603864 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.0 112.824112599 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.75 22.9334400587 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.23603664747 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0898225851491 0.215688989381 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0401516181244 0.103423049105 39% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0273008899011 0.0843802449381 32% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0641119259383 0.15604864568 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.017796869678 0.0819641961636 22% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.2329268293 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.74 11.4140731707 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.56 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.