The carbon emission per person in UK, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.
The line graph illustrates the average rate of carbon dioxide emitted per individual measured in metric tonnes, in four countries over half a century from 1967 to 2007.
Overall, whereas the figures for Carbon emissions dropped considerably for the UK and Sweden, the opposite trend is observed for Italy and Portugal. However, despite the decrease, numbers for the UK reports the highest of all.
Focusing on the UK and Sweden, the former began the period at the highest of CO2 emitted at 11 metric tonnes, the latter started at just below 9 metric tonnes. Regarding the United Kingdom, there was a leveling off for the first decade, after which the data show a gradual decrease to a low point of just above 8 metric tonnes by the end of the period. Similarly, In Sweden, after an initial growth in the rate of emission to about 10 metric tonnes, this then plunged to around 5 metric tonnes in 2007.
In contrast, with regards to Itlay and Portugal, despite emissions rising in both the nations, their numbers began at as low as 4 and 1 metric tonnes respectively. Moreover, the figures for Portugal rose as much as five times its initial to reach 5metric tonnes, which is also the lowest for Sweden. Meanwhile, Italy's emissions doubled to around 8 metric tonnes by the end of the studied period.
- The chart below shows the different levels of post school qualifications in Australia and the proportion of men and women who held them in 1999
- Many People believe that social networking sites have huge negative impact on both individuals and society 67
- the production and consumption of electricity in the top ten countries in the year 2014 78
- the percentage of households owned and rented in England and Wales in between 1918 and 2011
- The graph below shows the demand for electricity in England during typical days in winter and summer The pie chart shows how electricity is used in an average English home 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, moreover, regarding, similarly, so, then, whereas, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1081.0 965.302439024 112% => OK
No of words: 226.0 196.424390244 115% => OK
Chars per words: 4.78318584071 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87727950738 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46078572083 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 106.607317073 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.561946902655 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 333.9 283.868780488 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 3.36585365854 267% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.1026048026 43.030603864 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.111111111 112.824112599 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.1111111111 22.9334400587 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.1111111111 5.23603664747 193% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.213090492399 0.215688989381 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.087385649204 0.103423049105 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0563397367567 0.0843802449381 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132467296468 0.15604864568 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0343792086641 0.0819641961636 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.2329268293 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.74 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.35 8.06136585366 116% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 40.7170731707 157% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.