The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The given bar chart illustrates four means of products’ transportation used during the period from 1974 to 2002 in Great Britain.
Looking from the overall perspective, it is apparent that the majority of goods are transported by the road modes of transport and the pipelines tend to be the less used in transportation purposes. With the passage of twenty years between 1974 and 1994 the total turnover of goods transmitted by pipelines was moderately increased approximately from 5 to almost 22 million tones and then reached a plateau throughout the remaining part of the period.
The road service appears not to follow this pattern. The total number of transported goods was constantly fluctuating from 1974 to 1982 it was hovering around 70 million tones. What follows is different as it experienced sharp growth by more than 10 million tones by the end of 1990, after that took a nosedive by 2-3 million tones and then started to rise moderately, almost reaching 100 million in 2002.
The water vehicles’ utilization was quite contrary to the railway counterparts. Until 1978 they have a striking similarity in total turnover of goods transported, totaling approximately to 40 million tons per each, but after that, we notice the tremendous rise in the goods transported by water means and dramatical decline in rail transport turnover. Throughout the remaining years, the quantity of rail transported products was fluctuating between 30 and 40 million tons, whereas water transportation decreased its turn to 50 million tons in 1998 and then increased dramatically up to 65 million tons.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-05-10 | mary.ssherr | 78 | view |
| 2022-07-30 | nguyenanhkhoi1702 | 61 | view |
| 2022-07-30 | nguyenanhkhoi1702 | 67 | view |
| 2021-05-16 | Ly8 | 89 | view |
| 2021-01-03 | Anastasia0511 | 82 | view |
- Some people say that rich countries should help poor countries with trade health and education Do you agree or disagree Give reasons for your answer and include examples from your experience 84
- Completing university education is thought by some to be the best way to get a good job On the other hand other people think that getting experience and developing soft skills is more important Discuss both sides and give your opinion 89
- The chart below shows the value of one country s exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016 The table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main 89
- The charts below show the average percentage in typical meals of three types of nutrients all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Some people think that when recruiting companies should aim to take on people who are innovative and able to work independently when others consider they should recruit people who are able to work in team and follow instructions Discuss both views and giv 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 301, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...nes by the end of 1990, after that took a nosedive by 2-3 million tones and then started t...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, look, then, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 33.7804878049 142% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1345.0 965.302439024 139% => OK
No of words: 258.0 196.424390244 131% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21317829457 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00778971557 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02472882025 2.65546596893 114% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 106.607317073 137% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.565891472868 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 382.5 283.868780488 135% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 76.5981980899 43.030603864 178% => OK
Chars per sentence: 149.444444444 112.824112599 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.6666666667 22.9334400587 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.11111111111 5.23603664747 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.192249821992 0.215688989381 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0829067162697 0.103423049105 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0617492819643 0.0843802449381 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128653253735 0.15604864568 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0317670832423 0.0819641961636 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 13.2329268293 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.52 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.53 11.4140731707 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.64 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 40.7170731707 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.