Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve the growing traffic and pollution problems.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the statement?
What other measures do you think might be effective?
Traffic and pollution are the major problematic fields that are discussed almost universally nowadays. A plethora of solutions have been already proposed on this issue and some of them offer the increasing cost of petrol as a way to cut down the traffic jams and environmental pollution consequently. But whether this solution is effective or not is a debate. By the way, I reckon that with the advent of technology people are able to cope with these problems using other sources of fuel: wind, solar and hydro powers.
On the one hand, it is of note, that social-psychological laws force people to stick to that statement: the higher cost leads to a considerable decrease in the customers’ demand. Therefore, the increasing price of petrol will inevitably lead to a reduction of drivers on the roads by the obvious reasons such as inability to fill their tanks and reasonable utilization of personal financial resources. Insequent, the number of people who use public vehicles would tremendously grow up. However, the petrol cost augmentation would cause the rise in transportation cost for services from various backgrounds. The price for delivery of products would be increased significantly and it will have the majority of detrimental effects on our economy overall.
Alongside the tangible effect on the economy, the fast-paced advancements will provide people with the opportunity to use more environmentally friendly sources of energy. The more sustainable sources of fuel like wind, water, and solar powers will reduce the carbon dioxide emission to the atmosphere, which, in order, curb the escalating pollution. In addition, the universal transition of all means of vehicles on another kind of fuel will enhance the reduction in driving fare, which influences the number of people opting for traveling on eco-friendly buses and trams.
To conclude, I believe, that, nowadays, not all ways of struggling with the overwhelming traffic and nature’s pollution are quite beneficial as it was proved upon. The dramatic increase in petrol price would have a more detrimental effect and people woes rather than changes for betterment. The government is worth thinking to invest in the evolvement of other sources of fuel and energy, which cause less traffic congestion and air pollution.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-10-29 | Hồ Phi Long | 73 | view |
| 2022-10-29 | Hồ Phi Long | 84 | view |
| 2021-12-09 | TreeSloth2004 | 78 | view |
| 2020-12-31 | Anastasia0511 | 78 | view |
| 2020-12-31 | Anastasia0511 | 84 | view |
- In some countries owning a home rather than renting one is very important for people Why might this be the case Do you think this is positive or negative situations 78
- Some people say that the best ways to improve public health is by increasing number of sport facilities Others would say that this would have little effect and that other measures are required Discuss both these views and give your opinion 89
- Some people say that rich countries should help poor countries with trade health and education Do you agree or disagree Give reasons for your answer and include examples from your experience 78
- The two maps below show the road access to a city hospital in 2007 and 2010 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with the projections until 2030 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 45, Rule ID: ALL_WAYS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'always'?
Suggestion: always
...onclude, I believe, that, nowadays, not all ways of struggling with the overwhelming tra...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, however, if, so, therefore, i reckon, in addition, kind of, such as, by the way
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 41.998997996 138% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.3376753507 228% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1933.0 1615.20841683 120% => OK
No of words: 365.0 315.596192385 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.29589041096 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37092360658 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05990235783 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 176.041082164 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.564383561644 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 611.1 506.74238477 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 10.0 2.52805611222 396% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.9524391808 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.866666667 106.682146367 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.3333333333 20.7667163134 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.53333333333 7.06120827912 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.169774003446 0.244688304435 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.056555132329 0.084324248473 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0363666610332 0.0667982634062 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108547598758 0.151304729494 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0581069587034 0.056905535591 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.0946893788 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.76 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.72 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 78.4519038076 144% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.