Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve the growing traffic and pollution problems. To what extent do you agree or disagree with the statement? What other measures do you think might be effective?
Some people might argue that the most effective method to deal with the growth of traffic and pollution issues is raising the cost of fuel. In this essay, however, I will challenge this school of thought.
One might argue that increasing the gasoline cost could help to solve environmental problems. They believe that by increasing the cost of fuel, citizens, particularly those looking to save money, would give up using their own vehicles for public one. However, this line of reasoning is not really sound because even if the price is raised, the public traffic system is not enough for the demand. As a result, people will continue to ride their personal bikes. In other words, when public transit does not provide enough facilities and petrol prices rise, people tend to use their own vehicles, especially bicycles. Despite the fact that it is beneficial to the environment, the number of automobiles on the road continues to rise.
Apart from the practical disadvantages expressed above, I believe that the government should promote people about the other alternatives. The authorities should introduce renewable energy sources such as solar power or water power to the people and encourage them to use it. This is because using those types of energies can reduce the amount of toxic gasses released from vehicles. Solar-powered automobiles, for example, transform solar energy into electrical energy so that they can operate without releasing toxic gas to the environment.
In conclusion, for the reasons I have mentioned above, I strongly believe that boosting up the petrol price is not the key to reduce transport congestion and environmental problems. Nevertheless, by encouraging people to use renewable energies to reduce the harmful effects of emissions from vehicles to the environment.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-10-29 | Hồ Phi Long | 73 | view |
| 2022-10-29 | Hồ Phi Long | 84 | view |
| 2021-12-09 | TreeSloth2004 | 78 | view |
| 2020-12-31 | Anastasia0511 | 78 | view |
| 2020-12-31 | Anastasia0511 | 84 | view |
- There is no need to complete an education beyond a primary school level Do you agree or not 61
- Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve the growing traffic and pollution problems To what extent do you agree or disagree with the statement What other measures do you think might be effective 78
- The growing number of overweight people is putting a strain on the health care system in an effort to deal with the health issues involved Some people think that the best way to deal with this problem is to introduce more physical education lessons in the 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 93, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ve, I believe that the government should promote people about the other alternati...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, look, nevertheless, really, so, apart from, as to, for example, in conclusion, such as, as a result, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1525.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 288.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.29513888889 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80345553624 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.569444444444 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 484.2 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.7675124633 49.4020404114 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.928571429 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5714285714 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.14285714286 7.06120827912 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.084518468 0.244688304435 35% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0309661334717 0.084324248473 37% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0371655782229 0.0667982634062 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0570708412816 0.151304729494 38% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0327224269391 0.056905535591 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.46 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.07 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.