Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve the growing traffic and pollution problems.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the statement?
What other measures do you think might be effective?
Traffic and pollution are the major problematic fields that are discussed almost universally nowadays. A plethora of solutions have been already proposed on this issue and some of them offer the increasing cost of petrol as a way to cut down the traffic jams and environmental pollution consequently. But whether this solution is effective or not is a debate. By the way, I reckon that with the advent of technology people are able to cope with these problems using other sources of fuel: wind, solar and hydro powers.
On the one hand, it is of note, that social-psychological laws force people to stick to that statement: the higher cost leads to a considerable decrease in the customers’ demand. Therefore, the increasing price of petrol will inevitably lead to a reduction of drivers on the roads by the obvious reasons such as inability to fill their tanks and reasonable utilization of personal financial resources. Insequent, the number of people who use the public vehicles would tremendously grow up. However, the petrol cost augmentation would cause the rise in transportation cost for services from various backgrounds. The price for delivery of products would be increased significantly and it will have the majority of detrimental effects on our economy overall.
Alongside the tangible effect on the economy, the fast-paced advancements will provide people with the opportunity to use more environmentally friendly sources of energy. The more sustainable sources of fuel like wind, water, and solar powers will reduce the carbon dioxide emission to the atmosphere, which, in order, curb the escalating pollution. In addition, the universal transition of all means of vehicles on another kind of fuel will enhance the reduction in driving fare, what influences the number of people opting for traveling on eco-friendly buses and trams. For instance, the mass rapid train in China and Japan as a sophisticated transport and well-managed train schedule has successfully brought up these countries in lessening traffic problem.
To conclude, I believe, that, nowadays, not all ways of struggling with the overwhelming traffic and nature’s pollution are quite beneficial as it was proved upon. The dramatic increase in petrol price would have a more detrimental effect and people woes rather than changes for betterment. The government is worth thinking to invest in the evolvement of other sources of fuel and energy, which cause less traffic congestion and air pollution.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-10-29 | Hồ Phi Long | 73 | view |
| 2022-10-29 | Hồ Phi Long | 84 | view |
| 2021-12-09 | TreeSloth2004 | 78 | view |
| 2020-12-31 | Anastasia0511 | 78 | view |
| 2020-12-31 | Anastasia0511 | 84 | view |
- The charts below show the proportions of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in 2000 and 2010 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Some people think that when recruiting companies should aim to take on people who are innovative and able to work independently when others consider they should recruit people who are able to work in team and follow instructions Discuss both views and giv 78
- The plans below show the layout of university s sport center now and how t will look after redevelopment Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 82
- The charts below show the proportions of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in 2000 and 2010 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 45, Rule ID: ALL_WAYS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'always'?
Suggestion: always
...onclude, I believe, that, nowadays, not all ways of struggling with the overwhelming tra...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, however, if, so, therefore, well, for instance, i reckon, in addition, kind of, such as, by the way
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 41.998997996 145% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 8.3376753507 240% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2096.0 1615.20841683 130% => OK
No of words: 394.0 315.596192385 125% => OK
Chars per words: 5.31979695431 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45527027702 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08074574689 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 224.0 176.041082164 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.568527918782 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 658.8 506.74238477 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 11.0 2.52805611222 435% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.8713438622 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.0 106.682146367 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.625 20.7667163134 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.375 7.06120827912 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.188558900455 0.244688304435 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0576992317445 0.084324248473 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0329309018257 0.0667982634062 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117528502373 0.151304729494 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0450334759704 0.056905535591 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.84 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 125.0 78.4519038076 159% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.