pie chart
The two pie chart illustrate the information about the production of different kinds of energy such as coal, nuclear, petro, AS AND other in France in between 1995 to 2005.
Firstly, in 1995, the production of coal, petro and gas was approximately same which was 29% whereas, the production of coal and gas was nearly same in 2005 and the production of petro was decreased. In addition, France had produced 29.80% of coal but this production slightly increased in 10 years of period. While, major increment can be seen for other type which was 4.90% to 9.10% in between these years. Furthermore, production of nuclear energy had been gone up from 6.60% to 10.10% in one decade.
Secondly, from pie chart, it can be seen that the demand for petro energy declined in one decade, from 29.27% to 19.55%. Moreover, only 1% was raised for gas production which is negligible.
Overall, the demand had been increased for all types of energy in France in between 1995 to 2005 except for petro. It can be conclude that, in France people switched petro energy to other different kind of energy.
- plans 11
- The number of old people is increasing in many countries Some people think this causes problems whilst other people think that old people have an important role to play How far do you agree or dis agree 63
- two maps 11
- Process chart 73
- the advantages brought by the spread of english as a glabla laguage will outweight the disadvantages to what extend do you agree or disagree with this view 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, moreover, second, secondly, whereas, while, except for, in addition, kind of, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 899.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 188.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.78191489362 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70287850203 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52566612237 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.521276595745 0.547539520022 95% => OK
syllable_count: 257.4 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.6478242724 43.030603864 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.8888888889 112.824112599 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8888888889 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.6666666667 5.23603664747 261% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0993817277288 0.215688989381 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0513350702699 0.103423049105 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.096081871783 0.0843802449381 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104443516622 0.15604864568 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.106330016503 0.0819641961636 130% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.2329268293 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.44 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.48 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.