line graph
The line graph illustrated the information about the three types of spread such as margarine, low fat and reduced spread and butter and the consumption in grams in between 1981 to 2007.
Firstly, in 1981, the consumption of butter was nearly 140 grams and it peaked to approximately 160 grams in 1986 while, this consumption suddenly went down to 100 grams in 1991. After then, the trend of butter spread had been decreased gradually and reached to nearly 50 grams in 2007. Furthermore, low fat and reduced spread was now popular before 1996 and in 1996 only 10 grams was consumed. In contrast, the trend was inclined suddenly and went down to nearly 80 grams while, this trend was slightly declined in 2007.
Secondly, only 90 grams margarine spread was consumed in 1981 while, this consumption was fallen down slightly in 1986. Moreover, this trend again increased in 1991 and stayed steady till 1996 but again decreased with some fluctuation and reached to 40 grams.
Overall, butter was most popular in 1891 but it had been replaced with margarine and low fat and reduced spread whilst, low fat and reduced spread was most popular and margarine was least popular in 2007.
- Process chart 73
- The number of old people is increasing in many countries Some people think this causes problems whilst other people think that old people have an important role to play How far do you agree or dis agree 73
- Bar graph and line diagram 73
- Nowadays culture is much the same all around the world when compared to previous times Do you think this is a positive or a negative development 61
- Line graph 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 179, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[3]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'was the least'.
Suggestion: was the least
...d spread was most popular and margarine was least popular in 2007.
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, furthermore, moreover, second, secondly, so, then, while, in contrast, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 6.8 235% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 978.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 201.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.86567164179 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76529505866 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46122374767 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 89.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.442786069652 0.547539520022 81% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 260.1 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.5806741785 43.030603864 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.25 112.824112599 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.125 22.9334400587 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.375 5.23603664747 236% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0445995740353 0.215688989381 21% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0274388688511 0.103423049105 27% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0725964232369 0.0843802449381 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0548777377022 0.15604864568 35% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0950510299046 0.0819641961636 116% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 71.48 61.2550243902 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.39 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.