For hundreds of years, people have never stopped debating the effect of the decisions of young members of a community on its future since this decision-making is momentous. It is established beyond doubt that there are positive and negative view of this issue. Although it seems plausible at first glimpse that young people have no impact on the future of their societies, this proposal could not achieve what it promises. I will enlarge on what I mean in this essay.
Above all, nowadays young members of the society have a significant impact on the economic condition of their communities. To be more exact, there are a number of young people who have big portions of money, which build the economic system of our society. Take my cousin, for example. He started his work five years ago when he was just 20 years old. His work had an important impact on the economic situation of our society and nowadays our city is a place for lots of workers who come here from other town to work in his company to make more money for their families.
The other reason which deserves some words here is the fact that young people access to large groups of people by means of the internet. So, they can have a great cultural effect on those who use the internet and some application in their smartphone which means they can influence the future readily. Mark Zakerberg is a compelling example of that. He started Facebook some years ago when he was young and he had a great impact on the culture of not only his society, but also the whole world.
Another subtle point that I should deem is that young members of societies can affect the future of their communities politically as well as economically. To clarify this point, there are many young political people in government of different countries. For instance, our mayor is a 30-year-old person who makes many essential decisions for our city. I suppose that he makes our city an enjoyable place for living and I think this trend will continue in the future.
To sum up, based on aforementioned arguments, I strongly draw the conclusion that young members of the communities have a significant impact on the decisions for the future of their societies.
- Movies and televisions should always show audience that good people are rewarded and bad people are punished 78
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement When teachers assign projects on which students must work together the students learn much more effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects 76
- TPO 54 The Salton Sea in California is actually a salty inland lake The level of salt in the lake s water what scientists call its salinity has been increasing steadily for years because the lake s water is evaporating faster than it is being repla 80
- TPO 53 taxes on cigarettes 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement In the past young people depended too much on their parents to make decisions for them today young people are better able to make decisions about their own lives Use specific reasons and examples to su 76
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, so, well, for example, for instance, i mean, i suppose, i think, as well as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 13.8261648746 43% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.0286738351 154% => OK
Pronoun: 50.0 43.0788530466 116% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 52.1666666667 92% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1815.0 1977.66487455 92% => OK
No of words: 384.0 407.700716846 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.7265625 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4267276788 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59192827382 2.67179642975 97% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 212.727598566 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.497395833333 0.524837075471 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 576.0 618.680645161 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.600824235 48.9658058833 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.833333333 100.406767564 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3333333333 20.6045352989 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.27777777778 5.45110844103 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.173669447164 0.236089414692 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0566700505096 0.076458572812 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0461423194539 0.0737576698707 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103064819621 0.150856017488 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.02821783028 0.0645574589148 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 11.7677419355 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.15 10.9000537634 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.89 8.01818996416 98% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 86.8835125448 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, so, well, for example, for instance, i mean, i suppose, i think, as well as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 13.8261648746 43% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.0286738351 154% => OK
Pronoun: 50.0 43.0788530466 116% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 52.1666666667 92% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1815.0 1977.66487455 92% => OK
No of words: 384.0 407.700716846 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.7265625 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4267276788 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59192827382 2.67179642975 97% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 212.727598566 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.497395833333 0.524837075471 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 576.0 618.680645161 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.600824235 48.9658058833 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.833333333 100.406767564 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3333333333 20.6045352989 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.27777777778 5.45110844103 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.173669447164 0.236089414692 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0566700505096 0.076458572812 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0461423194539 0.0737576698707 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103064819621 0.150856017488 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.02821783028 0.0645574589148 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 11.7677419355 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.15 10.9000537634 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.89 8.01818996416 98% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 86.8835125448 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.