The maps compare the outlay of the public Park, called the Grange Park, between 1920 and the present time.
Overall, it is noticeable that there are a lot of modifications inside the park apart from the unchanged entrance areas in north and south parts of it.
According to the 1920 image of the Park, there was a fountain at the centre of the park, but today it is removed, and, instead, the rose garden is constructed that is surrounded by seats from all four sides of it. Stage for musicians, which was located next to the fountain, was renovated into a big amphitheatre for concerts. Additionally, two rose gardens, one of which was situated beside the south entrance and the other to the east of north entrance, are eliminated and a new café is built in the place of the latter.
Regarding the glasshouse located to the north-east of the park, water feature replaced it according to the current day map. Pond for plants is also removed, by inserting the children’s play area instead. While the two entrances, one facing the Arnold avenue and the other facing the Eldon street, remained at the same places, the new entrance is added in the underground car park.
- Some people say that modern technology has made shopping today easier while others disagree Discuss both views and give your opinion 89
- Some people believe that it is best to accept a bad situation such as an unsatisfactory job or shortage of money Others argue that it is better to try and improve such situations Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 69
- The diagram below shows how instant noodles are manufactured
- The diagram below shows how instant noodles are manufactured 61
- Some people think that outdoor activities are more beneficial for children s development than playing computer games To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 108, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ark, between 1920 and the present time. Overall, it is noticeable that there are...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, regarding, so, while, apart from
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 972.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 205.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.74146341463 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78388967377 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58704041489 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.560975609756 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 296.1 283.868780488 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.8912007127 43.030603864 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.5 112.824112599 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.625 22.9334400587 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.875 5.23603664747 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.189013232324 0.215688989381 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0809137056271 0.103423049105 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0630675508073 0.0843802449381 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119201855537 0.15604864568 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.051040052877 0.0819641961636 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.51 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.42 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.