Creativity should be used as the only true measure of intelligence
The author claims that the only measure of intelligence should be evidence of creativity. This claim is far too extreme to accept it as a one example fits all. While creativity is depictive of intelligence in some situations, there are so many examples which disagrees with the author’s claim, and it will be unfair characterize these people as unintelligent.
Firstly, the measure of intelligence should be on a case-by-case basis, and not a blanket generalization. For example, in the academic institution, hard work, diligence, punctuality and resilience are far greater indicators of intelligence than creativity. One could argue that creative is a major indicator of intelligence especially for an arts major student, the truth is, it is not what’s most important. A student of engineering or mathematics needs to be hardworking and diligent in their education while producing excellent results to be considered as intelligent.
However, while academic excellence is an example of when creativity is not the major determinant of intelligence, there are other fields which lack of creativity would most definitely be translated as a lack of intelligence. For example, the popular American rapper Jcole, is classed as one of the greatest rappers of all time, the creativity he expresses in his music, how he tells stories through music is the true measure of his intelligence. Another example is Leonardo da vinci, the creativity he expressed in his paintings are indicators of his intelligence. However, while creativity is the true measure of intelligence for artists and musicians, hard work has also played major roles in cementing their works as products of intelligence.
In addition, intelligence could also be reflected in how an adult handles situations around them. For example, an adult that settles a family dispute by patient and listening to different perspectives and making judgment which satisfies everyone equally. Or a student union body president, that listens to criticisms and acts accordingly in order to effect change rather than having a feeling of being above criticism. It will be an unfair classification of people like this as unintelligent.
In sum, a true measure of intelligence should be based on what’s required in different aspects of life, it should be evaluated on a case-by-case basis.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 340, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'an art' or simply 'arts'?
Suggestion: an art; arts
...ndicator of intelligence especially for an arts major student, the truth is, it is not ...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 153, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d be evaluated on a case-by-case basis.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, first, firstly, however, if, so, while, for example, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 19.5258426966 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 33.0505617978 67% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 58.6224719101 84% => OK
Nominalization: 22.0 12.9106741573 170% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1980.0 2235.4752809 89% => OK
No of words: 367.0 442.535393258 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.39509536785 5.05705443957 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37689890912 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.29025138017 2.79657885939 118% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 215.323595506 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.514986376022 0.4932671777 104% => OK
syllable_count: 644.4 704.065955056 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.59117977528 113% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.99550561798 180% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.3285969975 60.3974514979 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.75 118.986275619 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9375 23.4991977007 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.1875 5.21951772744 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.382531239246 0.243740707755 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.128706793135 0.0831039109588 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.116347246872 0.0758088955206 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.225586528656 0.150359130593 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0839409876826 0.0667264976115 126% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 14.1392134831 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 48.8420337079 66% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 12.1743820225 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.34 12.1639044944 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.77 8.38706741573 105% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 100.480337079 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.