People can eat a wide range variety of food that can be grown in other areas. As a result, people eat more food produced in other regions than local food. Do you think the advantages of this trend outweigh the disadvantages?
In today’s world of globalization, people now can buy food that is produced from other regions easily. For this reason, imported products are being consumed more than local products. From my point of view, I truly believe that there are some obvious advantages of this trend but its drawbacks are also undeniable and cannot be overlooked.
On the one hand, I concur that consuming food which is grown from many different places can have some main positive effects. Firstly, consumers will have a wide range of choices from many food manufacturers who can provide them a variety of food instead of seasonal products from local companies. Taking some Western countries as a prime example, with the cold and dry weather here, planting and harvesting coffee is simply impossible, however, people here still can enjoy coffee-related products that are imported from tropical countries like Vietnam. Secondly, buying products from other areas can also boost the foreign trade between the two regions not only in economic ways but also in cultural ways.
On the other hand, I am also convinced that imported food can sometimes be too expensive due to taxes and delivery fees, which often make it unaffordable for some people. Moreover, there are now so many unauthenticated imported products in the market whose quality is not guaranteed. Besides, many foods that are transported long distances need to be treated with chemicals and preservatives, consuming this type of food can cause negative effects on people’s health. In addition, this biased consuming behavior can lead to undeveloped domestic food industry and thus, traditional products with their cultural value will gradually disappear.
In conclusion, while I agree that eating a wide variety of food manufactured from different regions can provide people with positive impacts, its disadvantages are also irrefutable.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-03-16 | TLan168 | 61 | view |
| 2021-01-09 | Huy Do | 78 | view |
| 2021-01-09 | Huy Do | 61 | view |
| 2020-07-03 | thanh nguyen qc | 73 | view |
| 2020-03-27 | thaovuphuong19 | 78 | view |
- Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology Has this been a positive or negative development 84
- Students learn far more with their teachers than other sources internet television To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- The availability of entertainment such as video games on handheld devices is harmful to individual and to the society they live in To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology Has this been a positive or negative development 56
- There are more workers to work from home and more students to study from home This is because computer technology is more and more easily accessible and cheaper Do you think it is a positive or negative development 84
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 67, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...that consuming food which is grown from many different places can have some main positive effe...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, firstly, however, if, look, moreover, second, secondly, so, still, then, thus, while, in addition, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1585.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 296.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.35472972973 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82197747769 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.591216216216 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 496.8 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.3254222265 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.083333333 106.682146367 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6666666667 20.7667163134 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.1666666667 7.06120827912 186% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.387526841199 0.244688304435 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.147825315816 0.084324248473 175% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0872083957292 0.0667982634062 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.257882843394 0.151304729494 170% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0311268335153 0.056905535591 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.0946893788 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.05 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.09 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 67, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...that consuming food which is grown from many different places can have some main positive effe...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, firstly, however, if, look, moreover, second, secondly, so, still, then, thus, while, in addition, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1585.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 296.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.35472972973 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82197747769 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.591216216216 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 496.8 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.3254222265 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.083333333 106.682146367 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6666666667 20.7667163134 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.1666666667 7.06120827912 186% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.387526841199 0.244688304435 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.147825315816 0.084324248473 175% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0872083957292 0.0667982634062 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.257882843394 0.151304729494 170% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0311268335153 0.056905535591 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.0946893788 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.05 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.09 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.