The best way to travel is in a group led by a tour guide.
Given the hustle and bustle of modern hectic life, travelling plays an undeniable role in getting rid of the burdens of life. Everyone has their own styles of travel, each with its own advantages and disadvantages. Some people like to take a trip alone, while others think it is better to travel with a group led by a tour guide. Personally speaking, I concur with the latter group for a few reasons, two compelling ones of which have been elaborated upon hereunder.
To begin with, taking a trip with a group governed by a tour leader is more cost-effective than travelling in other ways. As leisure travel today has become more and more popular than ever before, hotels and restaurants have started to change ascendingly high costs for accommodation and food. Single occupancy rates are virtually uncommon nowadays, so sharing rooms with several members of a group is a good way to cut costs. Moreover, considering the noticeable number of people in a tour, hotels and restaurants give a considerable discount to the tour guide, which in turn decreases the price of food and accommodation by travelling with a tour. My own experience demonstrates some of the financial benefits of travelling with a tour. When I took a trip with a group led by a tour leader, our tour leader was able to rent an entire hotel and each room was allocated to two tour members. When the hotel operator noticed that all rooms became occupied completely, he was happy and rebated a thirty-per cent of the hotel expenses. Over the course of our one-week trip, the leader saved several hundred dollars in this way and eventually divided the money among the members of the group. This example indicates one of the most beneficial parts of travelling with a group.
Secondly, it is no secret to anyone that a trip tour as a small community can bolster confidence in interacting with others in a community. Travelling with a tour makes any trip much more appealing because it allows its members to talk together and even talk to local people. While an alone strange traveller can be seen as intimidating, a travelling tour is often considered more friendly, which means that the members no longer feel shy and local people behave sincerer. Under such a circumstance, spending a specific amount of time together brings about a new friendship and leads to spark the beginning of a long-term friendship. Given the example mentioned above, had I travelled alone, I would not have a few close friends right now.
In a nutshell, all the aforementioned reasons lead us to the conclusion that my preferred style of travel is to take a trip with a tour led by a guide. Not only it makes any trip more economical than other styles, but it also prompts new relationships and friendships for people.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-11 | Pham Ngoc Anh | 76 | view |
| 2023-06-30 | AJ720 | 88 | view |
| 2023-06-08 | Vivian Chang | 70 | view |
| 2023-06-08 | Vivian Chang | 70 | view |
| 2023-06-02 | Hibahtabbaa | 70 | view |
- When teachers assign projects on which students must work together the students learn much more effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects 80
- Some people say that the Internet provides people with a lot of valuable information Others think access to much information creates problems Which view do you agree with 73
- Because the world is changing so quickly people now are less happy or less satisfied with their lives than people were in the past 70
- Teachers should not make their social or political views known to students in the classroom 73
- when classmates or colleagues communicate about a project in person instead of by e mail they will produce better work for the project 42
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 682, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
... a tour. My own experience demonstrates some of the financial benefits of travelling with a...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, while, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 9.8082437276 31% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 43.0788530466 56% => OK
Preposition: 69.0 52.1666666667 132% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2296.0 1977.66487455 116% => OK
No of words: 477.0 407.700716846 117% => OK
Chars per words: 4.81341719078 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.67336384929 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80937294266 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 251.0 212.727598566 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.526205450734 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 730.8 618.680645161 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.8533233228 48.9658058833 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.8 100.406767564 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.85 20.6045352989 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.35 5.45110844103 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.293130077786 0.236089414692 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0964373396031 0.076458572812 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0675602332976 0.0737576698707 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.178252737738 0.150856017488 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0650042487899 0.0645574589148 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 11.7677419355 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 58.1214874552 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 10.9000537634 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.48 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 86.8835125448 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.