The bar chart below shows figures for annual coffee and meat consumption.
The bar chart demonstrates the consumption of meat and coffee in seven different nations namely Norway, France, Germany, the USA, Russia, China, and Japan every year.
Overall, it can be seen that the US recorded by far the highest percentage in meat consumption, while Germany contained the highest figure in coffee usage.
Looking at the bar graph in more detail, the USA leads the survey with 122 kg per person, which is twice as high as Norway stands at 60 kg per person. Moreover, Germany settles in second place for meat consumption at 87 kg, which is higher than France at 72 kg. Furthermore, compared to other countries, the amount of consumption for Asian nations is considerably lower, (47kg, 45kg, 42kg) respectively.
As for coffee consumption, Norway consumes most coffee with 9 kg per person, while Japan and China have the least coffee at 3 kg and 2 kg per person. On the other hand, there is no big disparity between the ratio for remaining countries such as Germany (7kg) and Russia (5 kg), and the US (4kg).
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-10 | nobitaa | 78 | view |
| 2024-11-10 | nobitaa | 78 | view |
| 2024-11-04 | khanhkhanhlhp | view | |
| 2024-11-04 | khanhkhanhlhp | view | |
| 2024-11-04 | khanhkhanhlhp | view |
- In some countries the average weight of people is increasing and their level of health and fitness is decreasing What do you think are the causes of these problems and what measures could be taken to solve them 61
- The bar chart below shows figures for annual coffee and meat consumption 78
- Many educational institutions give greater importance to subjects related to science and ignore subjects such as drama and literature Why is this Is this a positive or negative development 73
- The graph below shows in percentage terms the changing patterns of domestic access to modern technology in homes in the UK 78
- Television is dangerous because it destroys family life and any sense of community instead of visiting people or talking with our family we just watch television To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 92
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, look, moreover, second, so, while, as for, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 18.0 33.7804878049 53% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 849.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 178.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.76966292135 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65262427087 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64279718719 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.623595505618 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 241.2 283.868780488 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 16.3532434529 43.030603864 38% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 121.285714286 112.824112599 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.4285714286 22.9334400587 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.2857142857 5.23603664747 235% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.223553022105 0.215688989381 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105673574736 0.103423049105 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.060330695025 0.0843802449381 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143860359447 0.15604864568 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0480188743895 0.0819641961636 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.6 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.